Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDahlström, Elin
dc.contributor.authorVendelin, Laura
dc.contributor.authorMattsson, Tove
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-10T09:37:10Z
dc.date.available2023-03-10T09:37:10Z
dc.date.issued2023-03-10
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2077/75493
dc.description.abstractAbstract Title: Answer the question! - A Conversation Analytical Study of interview techniques in the program Agenda and 30 minutes. Authors: Elin Dahlström, Laura Vandelin och Tove Mattsson Level: Bachelor thesis in Journalism Term: HT 2022 Supervisor: Mats Ekström This article investigates how the three different interview techniques mirroring, hypothetical questions and multiple questions directly following each other, which are not commonly associated with standard journalist practice, are used and met in political interviews. Using Conversation Analysis, the interview interaction consisting of the institutional genre, political interviews, is analyzed. The specific interviews chosen for investigation are taken from two different Swedish interview programs, Agenda and 30 minutes. Both programs are between a journalist and a Swedish politician, broadcasted in 2022 on Swedish Television (SVT). Previous research has shown that both hypothetical questions and multiple questions directly following each other are rarely recommended in journalistic interviews. However, the authors argue that these three interview techniques result in both pros and cons in how the interview develops and whether the journalist's question is being answered by the politicians or not. The study shows that politicians tend to question the premise of the question when both multiple questions directly following each other and hypothetical questions are used, which impairs the chances of the question being answered. Mirroring, which is originally a technique used in psychotherapy, is in a journalistic context mainly used as a way of questioning the politician's answer. The combination of an interruption and a repetition of the politician's statement is also done with the aim of persisting with what the politician said previously. However, when the interviewed politician agrees with the premises of the question, all three techniques tend to result in evolved and detailed responses.en
dc.language.isosween
dc.relation.ispartofseriesKH22-4en
dc.subjectPolitical interview, Conversation Analysis, Interview techniques, Interactionen
dc.titleSvara på frågan! En samtalsanalytisk studie om intervjutekniker i Agenda och 30 minuteren
dc.typeText
dc.typeText
dc.setspec.uppsokSocialBehaviourLaw
dc.setspec.uppsokSocialBehaviourLaw
dc.type.uppsokM2
dc.type.uppsokM2
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Gothenburg/Department of Journalism, Media and Communicationeng
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet/Institutionen för journalistik, medier och kommunikationswe
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Gothenburg/Department of Journalism, Media and Communicationeng
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet/Institutionen för journalistik, medier och kommunikationswe
dc.type.degreeStudent essay
dc.type.degreeStudent essay


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record