THE CONSENSING APPROACH TO STRATEGIZING: The Dynamics of Dialogue in Public Sector Digital Transformation
Abstract
This thesis explores the role of consensing, a process of cognitive consensus-building through the mechanisms of sensing and synthesizing, in digital transformation strategy formulation within the Swedish public sector. It introduces the novel concepts of consensus surplus (a shared understanding that exceeds the requirements for action), deficit (insufficient shared understanding to support strategy implementation), and debt (the accumulation of unresolved issues due to a lack of consensus-building). The study argues that consensing plays a critical role in aligning strategic intent and shared understanding among stakeholders, leading to these varied outcomes. This process is enabled by the organizational infrastructure of dialogue, which encompasses generative, diagnostic, and integrative dialogue types that facilitate the development of shared understanding.
Drawing upon a critical realist stance and an abductive and retroductive research approach, this study offers a nuanced perspective on the cognitive dynamics of consensing based on an in-depth analysis of qualitative data from interviews, surveys, and document analysis. It challenges prevailing notions and encourages a more collaborative approach to strategy formulation. The thesis conceptualizes consensing as a mechanism for aligning strategic intent with shared understanding, a novel approach in the formulation of digital transformation strategies.
The thesis contributes to digital strategizing literature by highlighting the role of consensing in bridging the gap between intended and realized strategies. It proposes actionable strategies for fostering effective dialogue and mitigating status quo bias, thereby facilitating more dynamic and inclusive strategy formulation processes. The research also outlines potential avenues for future inquiry, such as exploring the impact of organizational culture on consensing processes and examining the role of digital platforms in facilitating consensus-building.
By presenting consensing as a vital tool for organizations navigating digital transformation, this research enriches the discourse in digital strategizing and organizational practice. It advocates for a deeper understanding and application of consensing to enhance the efficacy of strategy formulation in the public sector, with implications for both theory and practice.
Parts of work
1. Magnusson, J., Khisro, J., Lindroth, T., Nilsson, A., & Norling, K. (2022). Rhizomatic Strategizing in Digital Transformation: A Clinical Field Study. Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii Interna-
tional Conference on System Sciences, https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2022.777
2. Norling, K., Lindroth, T., Magnusson, J., & Torell, J. (2022). Digital Decoupling: A Population Study of Digital Transformation Strategies in Swedish Municipalities. DG.O 2022: The 23rd Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research, 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543434.3543639
3. Norling, K., Magnusson, J., Lindroth, T., & Torell, J. (2022). Strategic Responses to the COVID Pandemic: Empirical Evidence of Shifts in Digital Transformation Strategy. AMCIS 2022. https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2022/sig_dite/sig_dite/2
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
University
University of Gothenburg. IT Faculty
Institution
Department of Applied Information Technology ; Institutionen för tillämpad informationsteknologi
Disputation
Fredagen den 3 maj 2024, kl. 13.00, Torg Grön (4:e våningen), Hus Patricia, Institutionen för Tillämpad IT, Forskningsgången 6, Göteborg
Date of defence
2024-05-03
kristian.norling@ait.gu.se
Date
2024-04-10Author
Norling, Kristian
Keywords
consensing, cognitive consensus, consensus debt, dialogue, dialogue inertia, digital transformation strategy, digital strategizing, alignment, shared understanding
Publication type
Doctoral thesis
ISBN
978-91-8069-623-4 (tryckt)
978-91-8069-624-1 (PDF)
Series/Report no.
Gothenburg Studies in Informatics, report 66
Language
eng