dc.contributor.author | Johansson-Stenman, Olof | swe |
dc.date.accessioned | 2006-12-05 | swe |
dc.date.accessioned | 2007-02-09T11:16:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2007-02-09T11:16:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | swe |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/2868 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper discusses how a benevolent policy maker should act based on some, possibly non-welfaristic,ethical principle in cases where peoples preferences are not perfectly informed,consistent and fully developed with regard to all goods, including all kinds of environmental goods, as is normally assumed in mainstream economic theory. When stated or revealed preferences do not reflect the maximization of individual welfare, it is argued that welfare,rather than preferences, has intrinsic value. However, it is also argued that properly designed stated preference methods may provide useful information about peoples views about alternative ethical ends, besides human well-being, and that policy makers should take such views seriously. | swe |
dc.format.extent | 67450 bytes | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | swe |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers in Economics, nr 34 | swe |
dc.subject | ethics; environmental policy; environmental valuation; cost-benefit analysis; endogenous preferences | swe |
dc.title | Environmental Policy when Peoples Preferences are Inconsistent, Non-Welfaristic, or simply Not Developed | swe |
dc.type.svep | Report | swe |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Economics | swe |
dc.gup.origin | Göteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Law | swe |
dc.gup.epcid | 2070 | swe |
dc.subject.svep | Economics | swe |