Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMartinsson, Peterswe
dc.contributor.authorEggert, Håkanswe
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-13swe
dc.date.accessioned2007-02-09T11:15:50Z
dc.date.available2007-02-09T11:15:50Z
dc.date.issued2003swe
dc.identifier.issn1403-2465swe
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/2811
dc.description.abstractEmpirical studies of fishers’ preferences have found that most fishers are risk-averse, while expected-utility theory predicts risk neutrality even for sizable stakes. We test this prediction using data from a stated choice experiment with Swedish commercial fishers. Our results show that almost 90% of the respondents do not behave as expected-utility maximizers. 48% of the fishers can be broadly characterized as risk-neutral, 26% as modestly risk-averse, while 26% are strongly risk-averse. Fishers are more risk-neutral the higher the fraction of their household’s income comes from fishing, while fishers with a positive attitude to individual quotas are more risk-averse. Sensitivity testing implies that decisions with modest stakes like a few days of fishing are not influenced by wealth level.swe
dc.format.extent25 pagesswe
dc.format.extent387540 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenswe
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers in Economics, nr 90swe
dc.subjectExpected utility; Prospect theory; Risk preferences; Stated preferences; Swedish fisheriesswe
dc.titleAre Commercial Fishers Risk Lovers?swe
dc.type.svepReportswe
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Economicsswe
dc.gup.originGöteborg University. School of Business, Economics and Lawswe
dc.gup.epcid2629swe
dc.subject.svepEconomicsswe


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record