Learning to argue in primary school: A sociocultural study of group discussions with argumentative tasks

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis

Abstract

The learning and development of argumentation as a social practice is considered to be fundamental for living in democratic societies. The purpose of this thesis is to contribute to the growing literature on children’s argumentation, specifically in group discussions with argumentative tasks in the context of civic education. With the aim of characterizing children’s argumentation and the framing of the study with a sociocultural perspective on learning and communication, the design can be described as explorative and observational. The data consist of video recordings of group discussions of 9- to 10-year-old children in Germany, as part of the subject Sachunterricht which entails civic education. For the purpose of studying group discussions as an argumentative activity, tasks were designed in cooperation with Sachunterricht teachers. The two tasks are concerned with democratic concepts (equality/equity and Children’s rights) and present a problematic situation to the children, who are asked to give reasons for their opinions and come to a joint solution. The thesis contains three empirical studies which pose distinct but related research questions about (1) the handling of task premises, (2) changes in a focus child’s argumentative participation, and (3) a comparison between linguistically differently prompted groups. The findings show that the children handle the task premises dynamically; arguing within the premises, outside the premises, and questioning the premises. Further, the findings show quantitative and qualitative changes in the focus child’s argumentative participation which is interpreted as microgenetic development. Lastly, the findings show a comparable language use across the differently prompted groups. The findings are discussed in terms of their contribution to the research field, implications for practice, as well as theoretical and philosophical notions of learning and education for democracy.

Description

Keywords

children's argumentation, learning, group discussion, task, video observation, Sachunterricht, civic education

Citation

ISBN

978-91-7963-180-2 (PDF)
978-91-7963-179-6 (print)

Articles

Study 1: Eldstål-Ahrens, L., Nilsen, M., & Pramling, N. (2022). Premising and arguing: The variety in 9- to 10-year-old children taking on an equity/equality task in the context of group discussions. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 35, 100648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100648

Study 2: Eldstål-Ahrens, L., Nilsen, M., & Pramling, N. (2023). Microgenetic development of a primary school child’s argumentative participation in a small-group discussion. Classroom Discourse. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2023.2260505

Study 3: Eldstål-Ahrens, L. (unpublished manuscript, under revision). Comparing argumentative language use in conditionally vs. non-conditionally prompted group discussions of 9- to 10-year-old primary school children.

Department

Department of Education, Communication and Learning ; Institutionen för pedagogik, kommunikation och lärande

Defence location

Fredagen den 20 september 2024, kl. 13, C1 22, Margaretha Hvitfeldts auditorium, Läroverksgatan 5

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By