Dribbling past chronic pain – Evaluating meaningful support through a remote person-centred care intervention

Abstract

Background: Chronic pain has a profound impact on the persons living with it, their social networks and society. Support is crucial for people living with chronic pain; however, the concept of support is multifaceted. Overall aim: to elucidate the mean-ing of support among persons living with chronic pain and to perform an efficacy- and process evaluation of a remote person-centred intervention that combines tele-phone and eHealth support. Methods: Phenomenological hermeneutics was applied to elucidate the meaning of support (Study I). Inferential statistics were used in the randomised controlled trial Early Accessible Person-centred Rehabilitation for peo-ple with long-term pain (EAPER-P), to compare a composite score of self-efficacy and sick leave rate between a control group (n=30) and intervention group (n=29) (Study II). In a mixed methods process evaluation, the meaningfulness of the EAP-ER-P intervention was investigated and explored (Study III). In a multimethod study, the goals formulated in the EAPER-P intervention, their attainment and the distribu-tion of self-efficacy and sick leave rates depending on goal attainment were de-scribed (Study IV). Results: The meaning of support was illustrated with a football metaphor: balancing between being the most valuable player (being capable) and passing the ball (accepting help to continue being capable) (Study I). A statistically significant difference in the composite score was observed, favouring the interven-tion (Study II). Most participants perceived the intervention as meaningful, especial-ly the person-centred conversations. Talking to a friendly outsider (healthcare pro-fessional) without formal documentation proved valuable, and goals were considered meaningful upon successful completion. By contrast, the non-attainment of goals could lead to negative consequences (Study III). Goals encompassed pain, physical activity and function, other lifestyle habits, career plans and emotional processes; <20% of these goals were achieved. The group that achieved goals had a greater improvement in self-efficacy and a lower sick leave rate compared to the group that did not (Study IV). Conclusion: This thesis offers novel insights into the meaning of support within the context of chronic pain, aligning with a person-centred approach to care. Person-centred care demonstrates efficacy and meaning for individuals expe-riencing chronic pain; however, future interventions require meticulous attention to goal setting and achievement. Further research is needed to understand the influence of medical records and to develop eHealth components suitable for person-centred care delivery.

Description

Keywords

Chronic pain, Support, Person-centred care, Person-centered care, Intervention, Mixed methods, Multimethod, Randomised controlled trial, Phenomenological hermeneutics, Process evaluation, Efficacy evaluation, Capability

Citation

ISBN

978-91-8115-334-7 (print)
978-91-8115-335-4 (PDF)

Part of the series

Articles

I. Lilja, V, Wallström, S, Saarijärvi, M, Lundberg, M, Segertoft, V-A, Ekman, I. Balancing between being the most valuable player (MVP) and passing the ball: a qualitative study of support when living with chronic pain in Sweden. BMJ Open 2024;14:e079229. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/1/e079229

II. Lundin, Å, Lilja, V, Ekman, I, Andréll, P, Lundberg, M, Saarijärvi, M, Segertoft, V-A, Goudarzi, M, Fors, A, Wallström, S. Efficacy of a remote person-centred intervention for persons with chronic pain – The EAPER-P randomised controlled trial. In Manuscript.

III. Lilja, V, Ekman, I, Segertoft, V-A, Wallström, S, Lundberg, M, Saarijärvi M. Meaningfulness of a remote person- centred intervention for people with chronic pain: A mixed methods process evaluation. Submitted.

IV. Lilja, V, Segertoft, V-A, Ekman, I, Lundberg, M, Wallström, S, Saarijärvi, M. Goal setting and attainment in a remote person-centred intervention for people with chronic pain – a multimethod study. In Manuscript.

Department

Institute of Health and Care Sciences

Defence location

Fredagen den 17 oktober 2025, kl 9.00, Hörsal Arvid Carlsson, Academicum, Medicinaregatan 3, Göteborg

Opponent

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By