On the role of developing and working with models in modern physics education

Abstract

This thesis investigates how students construct and use models when learning modern physics, with a particular focus on abstract phenomena where mapping between mathematical and formal definitions and prior experiences are difficult. Previous research on models in science education has established that engaging students in model-based activities can enhance learning outcomes. However, a persistent challenge lies in making model use, refinement, and development meaningful for students in ways that mirror how scientists engage with models. This thesis comprises five interrelated studies to address this challenge. Three examine how Swedish upper-secondary students (and pre-service teachers in the last one) learn with novel model systems: a mechanical Paul trap as an analogue for a linear Paul trap (PapersI and II), an acoustic levitation apparatus paired with generative artificial intelligence tools (Paper III), and a simplified diagrammatic formalism for quantum teleportation (Paper VI). Two additional studies analyse representations and analogies relevant for quantum physics education: pictorial representations of the Bohr atomic model in upper-secondary and undergraduate textbooks (Paper IV), and the development of a new educational analogy for simple atoms based on optical levitation (Paper V). Methodologically, the studies employ a design-based research approach (Papers I and II) and an exploratory case study with narrative analysis (Paper III) with variation theory as a theoretical lens, and a qualitative, phenomenographic, single-group intervention study (Paper VI). In Paper IV, a new analytical approach is developed, drawing on embodied cognition and variation theory in a complementary manner to explore connections between image schemas and necessary aspects of objects of learning. Additionally, Paper V uses mathematical similarities as a basis for discussing the pedagogical value of a new educational analogy. This thesis argues for the crucial role of developing and working with models in physics education based on three overarching findings. First, students' prior knowledge and experiences have a strong influence on the outcomes of model-based learning by shaping what is likely to be noticed and identified metaphorical connections to previous embodied experiences of the world. Second, successful use of idealised models in laboratory settings, regardless of whether the idealised model is the physical phenomenon and the concepts to be learned are abstract, or vice versa, requires explicit attention to developing model descriptions. Third, when learning quantum teleportation through a diagrammatic formalism, students exhibit qualitatively different ways of experiencing the phenomenon, where powerful ways of understanding are related to a more developed abstract model for mapping between representations. Based on the findings, this thesis introduces the term modelising to highlight how students are engaged in model-based science in a particular way such that a previously developed model system can be used to understand a novel phenomenon.

Description

Keywords

Physics education research, discipline-based education research, upper-secondary school, laboratory work, qualitative intervention studies, variation theory, phenomenography, embodied cognition, conceptual metaphors, model-based science, model development, modelising, Paul trap, acoustic levitation, optical levitation, quantum physics,, Bohr atomic model, teleportation, generative artificial intelligence

Citation

ISBN

978-91-8115-631-7 (print)
978-91-8115-632-4 (PDF)

Articles

I. The Mechanical Paul Trap: Introducing the Concept of Ion Trapping. Kilde Löfgren, S., Méndez Fragoso, R., Weidow, J., & Enger, J. Phys. Teach., 61, 762-765 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0106359

II. Rolling balls or trapping ions? How students relate models to real-world phenomena in the physics laboratory. Kilde Löfgren, S., Weidow, J., & Enger, J. Sci. Education., 107(5), 1215-1237 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fsce.21802

III. Generative AI as a lab partner: A case study. Kilde-Westberg, S., Johansson, A., & Enger, J. Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res., 21(2), 020119 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1103/ggy1-3kjk

IV. Connecting with quantum: Examining pictorial representations of the Bohr atomic model using embodied cognition and variation theory. Kilde-Westberg, S. & Kersting, M. Manuscript in preparation (2026).

V. Shining light on quantum phenomena through a levitated water droplet. Marmolejo, J. T., Hanstorp, D., Enger, J., Méndez-Fragoso, R., Tendril, A.-M., & Kilde-Westberg, S. Eur. J. Phys., 46(4), 045403 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/add3a1

VI. Making sense of quantum teleportation: An intervention study on students' conceptions using a diagrammatic approach. Kilde-Westberg, S., Johansson, A., Pearson, A., & Enger, J. Submitted manuscript (2026). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.21443

Department

Department of Physics ; Institutionen för fysik

Defence location

Fredag den 27 februari 2026, kl 9.30, FB, Campus Johanneberg, Institutionen för fysik, Kemigården 1, Göteborg

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By