Ny inloggningsmetod är driftsatt i Gupea. Vid problem med inloggning eller behörigheter, kontakta gup@ub.gu.se

Constructing patient safety. Exploring unsafe care events in hospital settings as reported by patients, relatives, and healthcare professionals

Abstract

The conditions of hospital care are continuously transformed with advances in medicine and technology, and with organizational alterations influenced by the changing needs of the population. As these conditions affect patient safety, and because adverse events are a global public health problem today, knowledge about how unsafe care is understood and how patient safety can be achieved is needed. The overall aim was to explore the meaning and construction of patient safety. Three qualitative methods were used to analyze the collected data. In Studies I and II, 29 reported adverse events were analyzed using discourse analysis to explore discourses about patients and healthcare professionals. In Study III, 79 complaints were analyzed using qualitative content analysis to explore patients’ and relatives’ accounts of access. Study IV was a constructivist grounded theory study that explored how 12 individuals identified and responded to patient safety risks and adverse events. The findings in Studies I and II showed how the discourses that save lives also had the potential to cause adverse events. Study III showed how patients and relatives struggled to gain access by trying to legitimize their concerns as credible to receiving the care they needed. Study IV showed that the process of understanding patient safety risks started the moment the patients entered the hospital. Their understanding of adverse events kept evolving as long as questions remained unanswered. The lack of answers and recognition of concerns added to the suffering and, in the worst case, caused adverse events. In conclusion, when patients and relatives reached their limits in maintaining patient safety themselves, and their concerns and suffering were not acknowledged, this potentially caused adverse events and long-lasting suffering. The findings suggest that the structures of hospital care need to be evaluated regularly to ensure that they work to include the patients’ and relatives’ understandings of how patient safety can be achieved.

Description

Keywords

Access, Adverse events, Healthcare professional, Hospital care, Patient, Patient participation, Patient safety, Relatives, Unsafe care

Citation

ISBN

978-91-8069-407-0 (PRINT)
978-91-8069-408-7 (PDF)

Part of the series

Articles

I. Gyberg, A., Henoch, I., Lepp, M., Wijk, H., Ulin, K. (2019). Written reports of adverse events in acute care: A discourse analysis. Nursing Inquiry, 26(4), e12298. http://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12298

II. Gyberg, A., Henoch, I., Lepp, M., Ulin, K. (2021). Framing healthcare professionals in written adverse events: A discourse analysis. Nursing Inquiry, 29(3), e12461 http://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12461

III. Gyberg, A., Brezicka, T., Wijk, H., & Ulin, K. (2023). Struggling for access to appropriate healthcare services: A qualitative content analysis of patient complaints. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79, 3748–3759. http://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15688

IV. Gyberg, A., Brezicka, T., Wijk, H., & Ulin, K. From risk to adverse event: A grounded theory analysis of how patients understand and act upon patient safety risks and adverse events in hospital settings. [Unpublished manuscript].

Department

Institute of Health and Care Sciences

Defence location

Fredagen den 8 december 2023, kl. 13.00, Hörsal Arvid Carlsson, Academicum, Medicinargatan 3, Göteborg

Opponent

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By