Preference reversals in judgment and choice : the prominence effect
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Description
Keywords
Psykologi Kognitiv Viljeprocessen
Citation
ISBN
Part of the series
Articles
I. Montgomery, H., Gärling, T., Lindberg., & Selart, M. (1990). Preference
judgments and choice: Is the prominence effect due to information
integration or information evaluation ? In K. Borcherding, O. L. Larichev,
and D. M. Messick (Eds), Contemporary Issues in Decision Making.
Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland).
II. Montgomery, H., Selart, M., Gärling, T., & Lindberg, E. (1994). The judgment-choice discrepancy: Noncompatibility or restructuring? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 145-155.
III. Selart, M., Montgomery, H., Romanus, J., & Gärling, T. (1994). Violations of procedure invariance in preference measurement: Cognitive explanations.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. In Press.
IV. Selart, M. (1994). Can accountability and value differences modify the prominence effect in judgment and choice? Göteborg Psychological Reports, 24, 1-19.
II. Montgomery, H., Selart, M., Gärling, T., & Lindberg, E. (1994). The judgment-choice discrepancy: Noncompatibility or restructuring? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 145-155.
III. Selart, M., Montgomery, H., Romanus, J., & Gärling, T. (1994). Violations of procedure invariance in preference measurement: Cognitive explanations.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. In Press.
IV. Selart, M. (1994). Can accountability and value differences modify the prominence effect in judgment and choice? Göteborg Psychological Reports, 24, 1-19.
Department
Psykologi