Resolving pollination paradoxes: Bridging theory and empirical observations to understand pollination ecology and evolution

Abstract

Animal‐mediated pollination underpins the sexual reproduction of an estimated 230,000 flowering‐plant species and involves at least 300,000 florivorous animals. Yet we lack a broad, community‐level synthesis of how variation in animal pollination shapes both ecosystem function and species assemblages. Here, I review key challenges and opportunities in pollination ecology, introduce and examine ‘paradoxes’ of pollination biology, and argue that much can be gained from examining and discussing contradictions in the pollination literature. I use community ecological theory to explore the role of pollination in plant community assembly and vice versa in three Arctic sites (Chapter I). I then discuss how pollination and frequency-dependent effects arising from rarity impact plant diversification by limiting the establishment of new polyploid populations (Chapter II and III). I then discuss how the theoretical framework for understanding sexual selection in hermaphroditic plants can develop in the light of community ecological theory (Chapter IV). In the last two chapters, I focus on how implementing theoretical frameworks in pollination ecology can improve our understanding of threats from global change. Specifically, I show that implementing a more mechanistic framework can improve predictions of how pollinators contribute to ecosystem services, which impacts how both agricultural and natural ecosystems will be influenced by pollinator decline (Chapter V). Finally I show that understanding the mechanistic underpinnings of plant reproduction and how it is associated with plant size is crucial for understanding the consequences of shifting flower phenology (Chapter VI). I suggest that a conceptual synthesis in pollination biology is necessary to advance our understanding of how pollination contributes to the maintenance of natural ecosystems, how it contributes to society, and how pollination may be altered due to anthropogenic activities.

Description

Keywords

Pollination, Plant reproduction, Coexistance theory, Pollen limitation, Self-pollination, Polyploidy, Minority Cytotype Exclusion, Community Ecology

Citation

ISBN

978-91-8115-280-7 (Print)
978-91-8115-281-4 (PDF)

Articles

Osterman WHA, Rinao-Pacheco C; Bjornsdottir K; Gran O; Lang SI, Olsson M; Osterman M; Pavolotskaia M; Jong-Fälthammar G; Whitton J, Bjorkman AD. 2025. The role of pollination in structuring plant community composition across and within communities at high latitudes. Manuscript.

Osterman WHA, Hagan JG, Whitton J, Bjorkman AD. 2025. The ecology of polyploid establishment and exclusion, with implications for polyploid biogeography. New Phytologist 246: 47-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20451

Osterman WHA, Hill, A., Hagan, J.G., Whitton, J., Bacon, C.D. and Bjorkman, A.D., 2024. Rethinking pathways to the dioecy–polyploidy association: Genera with many dioecious species have fewer polyploids. American Journal of Botany, 111: e16318. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.16318

Osterman WHA. 2025. New perspectives on sexual selection in plants: why we need to integrate community and pollinator ecology. Manuscript.

Eerearts M, Siopa C, Osterman WHA, Osterman J, Chabert S, Verheyen K. 2025. The global contribution of wild insect and honeybee visitation to crop pollination success is asymptotic. Global Ecology and Biogeography (in Review).

Pavolotskaia M, Bjorkman AD, Pacheco-Riaño C, Osterman WHA. 2025. Does climate change improve or impoverish pollination? The estimated optimal flowering time is delayed when accounting for plant condition in Silene acaulis. Manuscript.

Department

Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences ; Institutionen för biologi och miljövetenskap

Defence location

10.00, 5 June, Medicinaregatan 7b, Gothenburg

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By