Attitudes regarding commuting, with an emphasis on car and public transport commuters, in areas with different levels of public transport provision - Understanding travel in Gothenburg from a traveller’s perspective
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
In today's society, people's mobility, namely their choice of transport modes, has direct impacts on greenhouse gas emissions. Society is constantly working to reduce these emissions, which often means reducing people's dependence on cars. It is suggested that the most effective way to make such a change is to encourage people to choose sustainable transport modes, such as public transport. However, more knowledge is required concerning factors influencing people's choice of transport modes. Therefore, this study aims to understand commuters' attitudes and travel behaviour. The study investigates how people living in two areas in Gothenburg, Sweden, with various levels of public transport provision, understand and experience commuting. More specifically, the study is interested in what people consider important when choosing transport modes for commuting. In addition, it aims to contribute to broader research and enhance understanding within the field. The study is based on 13 semi-structured, in-depth interviews with people living in Marklandsgatan and Billdal in Gothenburg, aged 21 to 36. These are people who commute to school or work mainly by public transport or car. The results show that time-related variables dominate the choice of transport modes. People emphasise reaching destinations on time. Commuting trips are often associated with adapting to time schedules and punctuality. Furthermore, economic and everyday-related factors also influence the choice of transport modes. People tend to choose the most affordable option based on their current life situation. Family situations also shape which transport modes are practically feasible for individuals. In addition, the study also finds that travel habits and environmental concerns have a minor influence on choices. Lastly, it is suggested that the presence of public transport provision may influence individuals' attitudes towards specific transport modes. High provision favours public transport use, and low levels tend to favour car use. The conclusions of the study are that 1) people mainly choose their transport modes based on time, followed by economic and everyday constraints. Additionally, habits and environmental concerns are less significant. 2) The attitudes of people living in areas with different levels of public transport provision differ, indicating that this attribute influences how people travel.