Critique de texte et interprétations de deux ouvrages exégétiques : Origène, Commentaire sur saint Jean et Théodore de Mopsueste, Commentaire sur les douze prophètes
| Alexanderson, Bengt | ||
| 2011-01-13T12:22:04Z | ||
| 2011-01-13T12:22:04Z | ||
| 2010 | ||
| Most of Origen's works in Greek has been lost, much has come to us in Latin translations, but his Commentary on the Gospel of St. John is preserved to a large extent, and in the original Greek. Since the text is often difficult and the editions have been criticised, many passages remain to be discussed. Like Origen, Theodore of Mopsuestia was a prolific writer whose works are mostly lost. The more the reason for looking closely into his Commentary on the Minor Prophets. Very little textual criticism has been done on this text. | sv | |
| 24 p. | sv | |
| http://hdl.handle.net/2077/24139 | ||
| gre | sv | |
| fr | ||
| Origen | sv | |
| Commentary on the Gospel of St. John | sv | |
| Theodore of Mopsuestia | sv | |
| Commentary on the Minor Prophets | sv | |
| textual criticism | sv | |
| Critique de texte et interprétations de deux ouvrages exégétiques : Origène, Commentaire sur saint Jean et Théodore de Mopsueste, Commentaire sur les douze prophètes | sv | |
| Text | sv | |
| other | sv |