Simulated Daylight Photodynamic Therapy for Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma and Actinic Keratoses
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The overall aim of this thesis was to evaluate simulated daylight photodynamic therapy (SDL-PDT) for the treatment of actinic keratoses (AKs) and superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC). The included studies assessed this novel lighting system from multiple perspectives. A technical validation study determined whether the light intensity achieved with SDL-PDT met theoretical treatment requirements. Additionally, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) compared the effectiveness of SDL-PDT and C-PDT in the treatment of sBCC and mild to moderate AKs. Finally, a qualitative study explored patients’ experiences with the two treatment methods.
Paper I presents the results of the technical validation study, in which the illuminance of SDL-PDT was evaluated at different angles and distances relative to the light sources. The findings underscore the importance of correct patient positioning, with optimal illumination achieved at angles of 0°-45°, while 90° angles resulted in inadequate exposure. Papers II and III report the outcomes of two RCTs comparing SDL-PDT and conventional PDT (C-PDT) for sBCC and AKs, respectively. After one year, clearance rates were significantly higher with C-PDT for both sBCC (91.8% vs. 62.4%) and AKs (85.3% vs. 71.0%). Paper IV presents a qualitative interview study conducted four weeks post-treatment with participants from the AK trial. The study revealed that while C-PDT caused severe pain and prolonged post-treatment reactions impacting daily life, SDL-PDT was associated with only mild discomfort and skin reactions. Most participants preferred SDL-PDT over C-PDT, although concerns about its long-term effectiveness were also expressed.
This thesis highlights the importance of optimal patient positioning for effective SDL-PDT treatment and emphasizes the need to balance treatment effectiveness with patient experience. While SDL-PDT offers a less painful alternative, its effectiveness is lower than that of C-PDT for treating sBCC and mild to moderate AKs.
Description
Keywords
Citation
ISBN
978-91-8069-356-1 (PDF)
Part of the series
Articles
II. Sjöholm A, Backman E, Modin M, Fougelberg J, Claeson M, Paoli J. Simulated daylight vs. conventional PDT for clinical superficial BCC: a randomized controlled trial. J EUR ACAD DERMATOL VENEREOL. 2025 FEB 18. EPUB AHEAD OF PRINT. http://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.20602
III. Sjöholm A, Backman E, Fougelberg J, Modin M, Claeson M, Paoli J. Simulated daylight vs. conventional PDT for actinic keratoses: a randomized controlled trial. IN MANUSCRIPT
IV. Sjöholm A, Claeson M, Paoli J, Heckemann B. Exploring patient pain experiences during and after conventional red light and simulated daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis: A qualitative interview study. ACTA DERM VENEREOL 2024;104:ADV19459. http://doi.org/10.2340/actadv.v104.19459