Den 5/1-2026 kommer GUPEA att vara otillgängligt för alla under hela dagen.
Navigating knowledge and values in primary care governance
Abstract
This dissertation explores tensions between different forms of knowledge and values embedded
within governance practices, aiming to contribute to more informed decision-making within
purchaser governance in Swedish primary care. Purchaser governance has evolved within a
landscape shaped by reform movements such as New Public Management (NPM), emphasising
efficiency and performance; the system of Knowledge-Based Management, considered an
operationalisation of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP); and the Trust Delegation’s inquiry, which
promotes post-NPM values such as professionalism and autonomy. These divergent influences
create challenges for purchasers, who must navigate competing demands. Grounded in Science
and Technology Studies (STS) and guided by methodological relativism, this dissertation
examines variations within the empirical material and uses theoretical concepts to illuminate these
variations. Two articles focus on the National Guidelines on lifestyle habits, published by the
National Board of Health and Welfare in 2011. These guidelines marked the first integration of
public health knowledge into the National Guideline format. The articles highlight tensions
arising during their development and in experiences of purchaser governance during
implementation in Region Västmanland. The other two articles explore the types of knowledge
and governance approaches employed in purchasers’ governance of primary care. One article
examines the tension between Knowledge-Based Management and Trust-Based Management,
while the other examines how contractual relationships between purchasers and providers involve
different forms of responsibility, trust, and control. The findings suggest that the so called
“policy-practice gap” that governance often seeks to bridge is better understood as interwoven
tensions, in which knowledge, values, and goals are continuously negotiated. These navigations
highlight the crucial role of professional judgment at the purchaser level
Parts of work
1. Lagerlöf, H., Zuiderent-Jerak, T., and Sager M. (2021). Epistemological
deliberation: The challenges of producing evidence-based guidelines on lifestyle
habits. Evidence & Policy: A Journal Of Research, Debate And Practice, 17(4). https://doi.org/10.1332/174426421X16149619907286 2. Lagerlöf, H., Eriksson L., and Sager M. (2024). Organizing implementation in
healthcare: Balancing orders of worth. Social Science & Medicine, 340, 116476.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116476 3. Lagerlöf, H. (2024). Multiplicities of knowledge and learning: Exploring the
codes of knowing in healthcare governance. Scandinavian Journal of Public
Administration, 2024, 28(4), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.58235/sjpa.2024.19429 4. Lagerlöf, H., and Sager M. (2025). Responsibility beyond accountability:
Navigating trust and control in Swedish primary care purchasing. (publishable
manuscript)
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
University
Göteborgs universitet. Humanistiska fakulteten
University of Gothenburg. Faculty of Humanities
Institution
Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of Science ; Institutionen för filosofi, lingvistik och vetenskapsteori
Disputation
Fredagen den 5 december 2025, kl 13.30, sal J330 Näckrossalen, Humanisten, Renströmsgatan 6
Date of defence
2025-12-05
Date
2025-11-07Author
Lagerlöf, Helena
Keywords
Healthcare governance, Science and Technology Studies, Evidence-Based Practice (EBP), purchaser–provider split, guidelines, orders of worth, codes of knowing, trust and control
Publication type
Doctoral thesis
ISBN
978-91-8115-485-6 (tryck)
978-91-8115-486-3 (pdf)
Language
eng