Learning to argue in primary school: A sociocultural study of group discussions with argumentative tasks
Abstract
The learning and development of argumentation as a social practice is considered
to be fundamental for living in democratic societies. The purpose of this thesis is
to contribute to the growing literature on children’s argumentation, specifically in
group discussions with argumentative tasks in the context of civic education. With
the aim of characterizing children’s argumentation and the framing of the study
with a sociocultural perspective on learning and communication, the design can be
described as explorative and observational. The data consist of video recordings
of group discussions of 9- to 10-year-old children in Germany, as part of the
subject Sachunterricht which entails civic education. For the purpose of studying
group discussions as an argumentative activity, tasks were designed in cooperation
with Sachunterricht teachers. The two tasks are concerned with democratic
concepts (equality/equity and Children’s rights) and present a problematic
situation to the children, who are asked to give reasons for their opinions and come
to a joint solution. The thesis contains three empirical studies which pose distinct
but related research questions about (1) the handling of task premises, (2) changes
in a focus child’s argumentative participation, and (3) a comparison between
linguistically differently prompted groups. The findings show that the children
handle the task premises dynamically; arguing within the premises, outside the
premises, and questioning the premises. Further, the findings show quantitative
and qualitative changes in the focus child’s argumentative participation which is
interpreted as microgenetic development. Lastly, the findings show a comparable
language use across the differently prompted groups. The findings are discussed
in terms of their contribution to the research field, implications for practice, as
well as theoretical and philosophical notions of learning and education for
democracy.
Link to web site
https://www.ub.gu.se/sv/hitta-material/actapublikationer/kopa-actapublikationer
Parts of work
Study 1: Eldstål-Ahrens, L., Nilsen, M., & Pramling, N. (2022). Premising and arguing: The variety in 9- to 10-year-old children taking on an equity/equality task in the context
of group discussions. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 35, 100648.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100648 Study 2: Eldstål-Ahrens, L., Nilsen, M., & Pramling, N. (2023). Microgenetic development
of a primary school child’s argumentative participation in a small-group discussion.
Classroom Discourse. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2023.2260505 Study 3: Eldstål-Ahrens, L. (unpublished manuscript, under revision). Comparing argumentative language use in conditionally vs. non-conditionally prompted group discussions of 9- to 10-year-old primary school children.
Degree
Doctor of Philosophy
University
Göteborgs universitet. Utbildningsvetenskapliga fakulteten
University of Gothenburg. Faculty of Education
Institution
Department of Education, Communication and Learning ; Institutionen för pedagogik, kommunikation och lärande
Disputation
Fredagen den 20 september 2024, kl. 13, C1 22, Margaretha Hvitfeldts auditorium, Läroverksgatan 5
Date of defence
2024-09-20
lea.eldstal-ahrens@gu.se
Date
2024-08-30Author
Eldstål-Ahrens, Lea
Keywords
children's argumentation
learning
group discussion
task
video observation
Sachunterricht
civic education
Publication type
Doctoral thesis
ISBN
978-91-7963-180-2 (PDF)
978-91-7963-179-6 (print)
ISSN
0436-1121
Series/Report no.
Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis: Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences 488
Language
eng