What helps improve outcomes of industrial policy? Evidence from Russia
Abstract
In the context of most developing countries, the implementation of industrial policy faces
significant challenges related to capacity, access to information, and governance limitations. This
situation accounts for the absence of widely recognised success stories – instances where
government agencies and policy instruments have an established track record of effectively
pursuing national objectives within the realm of industrial policy. This highlights a significant gap
in our understanding about which industrial policy tools can be effective in countries grappling
with broader deficiencies in their national accountability systems. In this article, we delve into the
state support programmes initiated by Russia’s Industrial Development Fund (IDF) since 2014.
These programmes aim to promote import substitution by providing industrial enterprises with lowinterest rate loans. Notably, the IDF programmes differ significantly from most other industrial
policy instruments employed by the Russian government in terms of their design, implementation
principles, and outcomes. Between 2014 and 2017, the implementation of the IDF’s programmes
produced statistically significant results, fostering the growth of sales for the supported enterprises.
Within our article, we shed light on the institutional features that contributed to the effectiveness
of the programmes and enabled the IDF to maintain the integrity of their procedures for selecting
beneficiaries and supporting them throughout project implementation. Our analysis has identified
a set of institutional arrangements that can maximise the positive impacts of state support
programmes while minimising the respective risks. Consequently, we believe that the successful
Russian experience in administering the programmes for direct state support holds substantial value
for a wide range of organisations compelled to implement government support programmes under
less-than-ideal institutional conditions. Furthermore, the emergence of more effective industrial
policy tools in Russia, such as the IDF, in the mid-2010s, may partially explain the increased
resilience of the Russian economy in the face of large-scale international sanctions imposed in 2022
due to its war in Ukraine.
Link to web site
https://www.gu.se/sites/default/files/2023-12/2023_19_Yakovlev_Freinkman_Ershova_Ahalian.pdf
Date
2023-12Author
Yakovlev, Andrei
Freinkman, Lev
Ershova, Nina
Ahalian, Albert
Keywords
industrial policy, manufacturing firms, development institutions, , subsidies, Russia
Publication type
article, other scientific
ISSN
1653-8919
Series/Report no.
Working Papers
2023:19
Language
eng