GUPEA >
Sahlgrenska Academy / Sahlgrenska akademin >
Institute of Clinical Sciences / Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper >
Doctoral Theses / Doktorsavhandlingar Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/2077/67129
|
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
gupea_2077_67129_1.pdf | Thesis frame | 5006Kb | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
gupea_2077_67129_2.pdf | Abstract | 337Kb | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Title: | Management of late term pregnancy |
Authors: | Alkmark, Mårten |
E-mail: | marten.alkmark@vgregion.se |
Issue Date: | 17-Feb-2021 |
University: | University of Gothenburg. Sahlgrenska Academy |
Institution: | Institute of Clinical Sciences. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology |
Parts of work: | I. Wennerholm UB, Saltvedt S, Wessberg A, Alkmark M, Bergh C, Brismar Wendel S, Fadl H, Jonsson M, Ladfor Ls, Sengpiel V, Wesström J, Wennergren G, Wikström AK, Elden H, Stephansson O, Hagberg H. Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Postterm Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised superiority trial. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2019;367:l6131 VIEW ARTICLE II. Alkmark M, Keulen J.K.J, Kortekaas J.C, Bergh C, van Dillen J, Duijnhoven R.G, Hagberg H, Mol B.W, Molin M, van der Post J.A.M, Saltvedt S, Wikström AK, Wennerholm UB, de Miranda E. Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: a systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials.PLoS medicine 2020;17(12):e1003436. VIEW ARTICLE III. Alkmark M, Wennerholm UB, Saltvedt S, Bergh C, Carlsson Y, Elden H, Fadl H, Jonsson M, Ladfors L, Sengpiel V, Wesström J, Hagberg H, Svensson M. Induction of labour at 41 weeks of gestation versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks of gestation: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Under review IV. Alkmark M, Carlsson Y, Brismar Wendel S, Elden E, Fadl H, Jonsson J, Ladfors L, Saltvedt S, Sengpiel V, Wessberg A, Wikström AK, Hagberg H, Wennerholm UB. Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol vs transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS). Under review |
Date of Defence: | 2021-03-12 |
Disputation: | Fredagen den 12 mars 2021, kl 13, Hörsal Arvid Carlsson, Academicum, Medicinaregatan 3, Göteborg |
Degree: | Doctor of Philosophy (Medicine) |
Publication type: | Doctoral thesis |
Keywords: | Obstetrics Induction of labor Postterm pregnancy Late-term pregnancy Perinatal morbidity Perinatal mortality Cost-effectiveness |
Abstract: | Background: The optimal time point to intervene and induce labour in women with a low-risk pregnancy, in order to decrease perinatal adverse outcome, is up for debate. Some advocate for induction of labour (IOL) at 41 gestational weeks (GW) and others for expectant management (EM) until 42 GW. Aim: To clarify, in women with a low-risk singleton pregnancy, if a policy of IOL at 41 GW (late term) compared with EM until 42 GW (postterm) was superior, in terms of neonatal and maternal outcomes, ... more |
ISBN: | 978-91-8009-192-3 (PRINT) 978-91-8009-193-0 (PDF) |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2077/67129 |
Appears in Collections: | Doctoral Theses from Sahlgrenska Academy Doctoral Theses from University of Gothenburg / Doktorsavhandlingar från Göteborgs universitet Doctoral Theses / Doktorsavhandlingar Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper |