Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLindberg, Johan
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-10T08:21:59Z
dc.date.available2017-04-10T08:21:59Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/52182
dc.description.abstractThis thesis encircles the Ongwen case currently pending in the International Criminal Court. The thesis develops a number of theoretical observations, focusing on the unique character of this case in terms of a ‘victim-perpetrator’ perspective. The main question dealt with in the thesis is, how should the institution of international criminal law deal with a former child soldier (victim), climbing in ranks and turning into a war criminal (perpetrator). Drawing upon scholars such as Hannah Arendt and Martti Koskenniemi, the thesis intends to develop a critical argument on the narrative of the trial, in particular on how we could provide etiological understanding of how atrocity occurs and spreads and whether this is within the capacity of international criminal law to handle. If the moral questions of a case in international criminal law transcend the capacity of procedural law, as we know it, do we in such a case need alternative remedies to accompany the trial in order to avoid trivializing complex conflict through trial?sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseries2017:70sv
dc.titleTrivialising Through Trial. The Victim-Perpetrator in International Criminal Law.sv
dc.typeText
dc.setspec.uppsokSocialBehaviourLaw
dc.type.uppsokH1
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborg University/Department of Laweng
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet/Juridiska institutionenswe
dc.type.degreeStudent essay


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record