GUPEA >
Faculty of Social Science / Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten >
Department of Psychology / Psykologiska institutionen  >
Doctoral Theses / Doktorsavhandlingar Psykologiska institutionen >

Competence, Styles, and Quality in Everyday Decision Making


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/40516

Files in This Item:

File Description SizeFormat
gupea_2077_40516_1.pdfThesis frame10425KbAdobe PDF
View/Open
gupea_2077_40516_3.pdfAbstract172KbAdobe PDF
View/Open
Title: Competence, Styles, and Quality in Everyday Decision Making
Authors: Geisler, Martin
E-mail: martin.geisler@psy.gu.se
Issue Date: 21-Sep-2015
University: Göteborgs universitet. Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten
University of Gothenburg. Faculty of Social Sciences
Institution: Department of Psychology ; Psykologiska institutionen
Parts of work: Geisler, M., & Allwood, C. M. (2015). Competence and quality in real-life decision making. Manuscript submitted for publication

Geisler, M., & Allwood, C. M. (2015). Cognitive decision making, social approach and time-approach associations with perceived stress. Manuscript submitted for publication

Geisler, M., & Allwood, C. M. (2015). Relating decision-making styles to social orientation and time-approach. Manuscript submitted for publication
Date of Defence: 2015-10-16
Disputation: Fredagen den 16 oktober 2015, kl. 10.00, sal F1, Psykologiska institutionen, Haraldsgatan 1, Göteborg
Degree: Doctor of Philosophy
Publication type: Doctoral thesis
Series/Report no.: Doctoral Dissertation
Keywords: decision making
decision-making competence
decision-making styles
decision quality
social skills
time approach
Abstract: This thesis had three aims. First, it explored the benefits of expanding the existing cognitively-oriented definition of individual differences in decision-making competence (i.e., measured by performance on traditional decision-making tasks) by including decision-related aspects of social skills and time-approach. Second, it investigated how an objective and normatively defined indicator for real-life decision-making outcome(s) relate to other, subjective indicators. Third, it examined if decis... more
ISBN: 978-91-628-9589-1
978-91-628-9590-7
ISSN: 1101-718X
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/40516
Appears in Collections:Doctoral Theses from University of Gothenburg / Doktorsavhandlingar från Göteborgs universitet
Doctoral Theses / Doktorsavhandlingar Psykologiska institutionen

 

 

© Göteborgs universitet 2011