Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCharron, Nicholas
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-21T07:20:53Z
dc.date.available2015-05-21T07:20:53Z
dc.date.issued2010-12
dc.identifier.issn1653-8919
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/39034
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the relationship between the party system, electoral formula and corruption. Previous research has focused on the various incentives for political actors to monitor, or engage in corruption based on variations in the electoral formula. However, the electoral formal has mainly served as a proxy for the party system – whether multiparty or two-party. In this analysis, I test directly the relationship between party systems and corruption and in addition, add a degree of nuance to the established line of thinking within this literature. I argue that two-party systems in countries with predominantly single-member district (SMD) electoral formulas will demonstrate lower corruption on average than multiparty systems in SMD countries. However, I argue that this effect does not play out in countries with proportional representation (PR). I test this hypothesis on 70 democratic and semi-democratic countries from 1987-2006 and find strong empirical support for the claim that multipartism in SMD countries is associated with higher levels of corruption, while the party system’s relationship with corruption plays no role in PR countries.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paperssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries2010:23sv
dc.relation.urihttp://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1350/1350186_2010_23_charron.pdfsv
dc.subjectparty systemssv
dc.subjectcorruptionsv
dc.subjectelectoral formulasv
dc.subjectproportional representationsv
dc.subjectsingle member districtssv
dc.titleParty System, Electoral Systems and Constraints on Corruptionsv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.contributor.organizationQoG Institutesv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record