Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNiklasson, Birgitta
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-11T13:35:23Z
dc.date.available2015-05-11T13:35:23Z
dc.date.issued2013-02
dc.identifier.issn1653-8919
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/38947
dc.description.abstractThis paper studies the relationship between New Public Management (NPM) and the political re-cruitment of civil servants. Some claim that NPM has had the unintended effect of muddling the politico-administrational divide, rather than the opposite. This argument is elaborated here by the suggestion that the managerialism and contractualism of NPM have provided politicians with a reason and the means to politicize the civil service by making more political appointments of agen-cy heads. Since there is not much empirical evidence for this relationship, it is also tested. The test is made through a cross-sectional analysis of the politicization of 120 Swedish public agencies in 2009. The results indicate that politicians do not appoint agency heads with a political background more frequently to public agencies with a stronger NPM orientation. Thus, the hypothesis that NPM leads to a politicized civil service is not supported.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paperssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries2013:03sv
dc.relation.urihttp://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1440/1440594_2013_3_niklasson.pdfsv
dc.subjectNew Public Managementsv
dc.subjectpoliticizationsv
dc.subjectpolitical recruitmentsv
dc.subjectpolitical appointmentssv
dc.subjectSwedensv
dc.subjectagency autonomysv
dc.subjectagency headssv
dc.subjectpublic agenciessv
dc.titleDoes NPM Increase the Politicization of the Civil Servicesv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.contributor.organizationQoG Institutesv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record