• English
    • svenska
  • English 
    • English
    • svenska
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Student essays / Studentuppsatser
  • Department of Economics / Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik
  • Kandidatuppsatser
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Student essays / Studentuppsatser
  • Department of Economics / Institutionen för nationalekonomi med statistik
  • Kandidatuppsatser
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Is the Risk-Return Tradeoff Hypothesis valid: Should an Investor hold Growth Stocks rather than Value Stocks?

Is the Risk-Return Tradeoff Hypothesis valid: Should an Investor hold Growth Stocks rather than Value Stocks?

Abstract
This paper will examine if smaller companies outperform large ones in the backwashes of the crisis, i.e. if growth stocks are better off than value stocks when investing. I will investigate how well the three largest companies from Nasdaq OMX’s small cap, mid cap and large cap managed to perform compared to the market index OMXSPI. Using the Capital Asset Pricing Model I will use the beta as a measure of risk to see if higher risk entails higher returns, as the risk-return tradeoff model assumes. Three portfolios consisting of three companies each will be observed and compared. The samples observed will be: i) a portfolio consisting of the three largest companies at Nasdaq OMX small cap list, ii) a portfolio consisting of the three largest companies at Nasdaq OMX mid cap list and iii) a portfolio consisting of the three largest companies at Nasdaq OMX large cap list and an comparing index: OMXSPI. The three portfolios will be divided into two different measure groups: one where the three portfolios are equally weighted and one where the portfolios are weighted by its market capitalization, to investigate if there are any significantly large differences. Each one of the three portfolios will also be compared to an appropriate index. The result supports the assumption of the risk-return tradeoff: the higher the risk, the higher the return. Given that the investor is willing to bear more risk, the return on the investment made will be higher. According to the research made I found that smaller companies do outperform larger ones, since the large cap portfolio had the lowest rate of return for the given time period. But the risk-return tradeoff assumption is not totally true: the small cap portfolio did not manage to outperform the mid cap, hence the best performance made after the crisis was by the mid cap portfolio. I therefore conclude that the risk-return tradeoff is partly true, that a mix of growth- and value stocks would generate the highest return and that more data need to be used to give more exact result.
Degree
Student essay
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/2077/36839
Collections
  • Kandidatuppsatser
View/Open
Thesis frame (969.0Kb)
Date
2014-09-10
Author
Krantz, Josefine
Keywords
CAPM
risk-return tradeoff
OMXSPI
beta
efficient markets
index
Series/Report no.
201409:101
Uppsats
Language
eng
Metadata
Show full item record

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV