The Importance of Face-to-Face Communication in HR Departments

Abstract

The present research project deals with the importance of face-to-face communication in the comprehensive scope of duty of Human Resources Departments. It analyzes different circumstances and conditions that characterize the use of this personal way of communication and explains motives and attitudes of Human Resources Executives in regard to their communication behavior. In addition the discussion points out limitations of the face-to-face communication channel and describes usual consequences in daily work situations. Compared to these aspects HR Managers also communicate by means of several media channels. The project illustrates different situations in connection with the disadvantages of each media channel and eventually demonstrates the interplay of all personal and impersonal communication behavior. The research question focuses the role of face-to-face communication in the work of Human Resources Managers. The qualitative research study is based on eight guided interviews with HR Personnel in leading positions from different companies and organizations in G teborg/Sweden. These interviews are evaluated with qualitative methods. Most important in regard to the data results is the fact that face-to-face communication is highly valued in business interactions today. Although there are many other opportunities and tools being used in increased frequency HR Managers still prefer the personal communication with their employees and clients in specific situations of uncertainty and trust. Remarkably characteristic is the conscious choice of each communication channel made by the HR Managers and its thorough questioning in terms of communication purpose, circumstances of the receiver, the topic’s complexity, time aspects and certain features of each channel. Global and regional companies exhaust all possibilities of the technological development but factors such as logistic arrangements, generational matters, company size and individual preferences still determine their communication choice to a high extent.