Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLyngfelt, Benjamin
dc.date.accessioned2010-01-13T08:16:31Z
dc.date.available2010-01-13T08:16:31Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationConstructions and Frames, 1 ( 2 ) s. 153-189en
dc.identifier.other10.1075/cf.1.2.01lyn
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/21730
dc.description.abstractBased on an extensive corpus study, this paper presents an overview of control patterns in Swedish infinitives and sketches a CxG account of the data. To capture the variety of control relations encountered, the approach combines elements of traditional CxG, Frame Semantics, and Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Three basic mechanisms are distinguished: control by selection, where the controlled element is coinstantiated with an argument of the selecting head; control by feature percolation, where the interpretation is determined by the syntactic and pragmatic context; and arbitrary "control", which is treated as non-control, where the understood subject argument is specified for generic or arbitrary reference and, hence, needs no controller. More specific control patterns, including such issues as control shift and pragmatic control, are treated as specific variants of these three basic types.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Companyen
dc.relation.urihttp://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/jbp/cf/2009/00000001/00000002/art00001en
dc.subjectcontrolen
dc.subjectinfinitiveen
dc.subjectimplicit subjecten
dc.subjectswedishen
dc.subjectconstruction grammaren
dc.subjectvalenceen
dc.subjectframeen
dc.subjectexternal argumenten
dc.subjectlocalityen
dc.titleTowards a comprehensive Construction Grammar account of control: A case study of Swedish infinitivesen
dc.typeTexten
dc.type.sveparticle, peer reviewed scientificen
dc.gup.mailbenjamin.lyngfelt@svenska.gu.se
dc.gup.guppubid96667


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record