Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate adipocyte metabolism Rickard Westergren Institute of Biomedicine Department of Medical and Clinical Genetics The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg Sweden Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 2 ISBN 978-91-628-8119-1 ©Rickard Westergren Institute of Biomedicine Department of Medical and Clinical Genetics The Sahlgrenska Academy University of Gothenburg Printed by Intellecta Infolog Göteborg, Sweden 2010 Rickard Westergren 3 Till Helena och Thea Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 4 Rickard Westergren 5 Abstract Type 2 diabetes is the most common metabolic disorder today and has reached epidemic proportions in many countries. Diet-induced insulin resistance plays a central role in the development of type 2 diabetes. Studies included in this thesis describe findings regarding two forkhead genes, Foxf2 and Foxc2, and their involvement in the development of insulin resistance. We produced a mouse in which the forkhead factor FOXF2 is overexpressed in an adipose tissue-restricted fashion, such mice display induced insulin secretion in response to an intravenous glucose load. In addition we could demonstrate that adipocytes from FOXF2 transgenic mice have an impaired insulin-mediated glucose uptake. We argue this to be, at least in part, due to lower expression of insulin receptor substrate 1. Mice overexpressing forkhead factor FOXC2 in adipose tissue have previously been shown to be protected from diet-induced obesity and glucose intolerance. In hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp experiments, we demonstrated that FOXC2 transgenic mice are protected from diet-induced insulin resistance in liver and skeletal muscle. Furthermore, on high-fat diet, FOXC2 transgenic mice displayed decreased intramuscular levels of fatty acyl CoA compared with wild-type littermates. Expansion and regression of adipose tissue requires continuous remodelling of the vasculature in order to meet demands of metabolism. We have shown that the adipose tissue of FOXC2 transgenic mice exhibit a higher vascular density and altered pattering of vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes. Furthermore, we could show this, at least in part, to be dependent on the role of FOXC2 as a direct regulator of Angiopoietin 2. Keywords: forkhead genes, Foxc2, Foxf2, Irs1, insulin signaling, glucose metabolism, insulin resistance, Ang-2, adipose tissue, angiogenesis. Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 6 List of publications This thesis is based on the following three articles, which are referred to in the text by their roman numerals (I-III). The articles are included at the end of the thesis. I. Westergren R, Nilsson D, Heglind M, Arani Z, Grande M, Cederberg A, Ahrén B, Enerback S. Overexpression of Foxf2 in adipose tissue is associated with lower levels of IRS1 and decreased glucose uptake in vivo. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Mar; 298(3): E548-54 II. Kim JK, Kim HJ, Park SY, Cederberg A, Westergren R, Nilsson D, Higashimori T, Cho YR, Liu ZX, Dong J, Cline GW, Enerback S, Shulman GI. Development 132:2623-2632. Adipocyte-specific overexpression of FOXC2 prevents diet-induced increases in intramuscular fatty acyl CoA and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2005 Jun; 54(6): 1657-63 III. Xue Y, Cao R, Nilsson D, Chen S, Westergren R, Hedlund EM, Martijn C, Rondahl L, Krauli P, Walum E, Enerback S, Cao Y. FOXC2 controls Ang-2 expression and modulates angiogenesis, vascular patterning, remodelling, and functions in adipose tissue. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 22; 105(29): 10167-72. Rickard Westergren 7 Publications not used in this thesis Virtanen KA, Lidell ME, Orava J, Heglind M, Westergren R, Niemi T, Taittonen M, Laine J, Savisto NJ, Enerbäck S, Nuutila P. Functional brown adipose tissue in healthy adults. N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 9; 360(15): 1518-25. Vidarsson H, Westergren R, Heglind M, Blomqvist SR, Breton S, Enerbäck S. The forkhead transcription factor Foxi1 is a master regulator of vacuolar H-ATPase proton pump subunits in the inner ear, kidney and epididymis. PLoS One. 2009; 4(2): e4471. Cornier MA, Donahoo WT, Pereira R, Gurevich I, Westergren R, Enerback S, Eckel PJ, Goalstone ML, Hill JO, Eckel RH, Draznin B. Insulin sensitivity determines the effectiveness of dietary macronutrient composition on weight loss in obese women. Obes Res. 2005 Apr; 13(4): 703-9. Di Gregorio GB, Westergren R, Enerback S, Lu T, Kern PA. Expression of FOXC2 in adipose and muscle and its association with whole body insulin sensitivity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Oct; 287(4): E799-803. Yanagisawa K, Hingstrup Larsen L, Andersen G, Drivsholm T, Cederberg A, Westergren R, Borch-Johnsen K, Pedersen O, Enerbäck S, Hansen T. The FOXC2 -512C>T variant is associated with hypertriglyceridaemia and increased serum C-peptide in Danish Caucasian glucose-tolerant subjects. Diabetologia. 2003 Nov; 46(11): 1576-80. Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 8 Abbreviations ANG-2 - Angipoietin 2 BAT - Brown adipose tissue FAT/CD36 - Fatty acid translocase FATP1 - Fatty acid transport protein 1 FFAs - Free fatty acids GLUT1 - Glucose transporter 1 GLUT4 - Glucose transporter 4 IKK-β - κB kinase-β IR - Insulin receptor IRS1 - Insulin receptor substrate 1 JNK - c-Jun amino-terminal kinase MEFs - Mouse embryonic fibroblasts PDK1 - Phosphoinositide-dependent kinase PI3K - Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase PIP3 - Phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphates PKB - Protein kinase B PKCθ - Protein kinase C θ PTP-1B - Protein-tyrosine phosphatase-1B T2D - Type 2 diabetes TNFα - Tumor necrosis factor-α VEGF - Vascular endothelial growth factor vSMC - Vascular smooth muscle cells WAT - White adipose tissue Rickard Westergren 9 Table of contents ABSTRACT

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 5

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
LIST
OF
PUBLICATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 6
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PUBLICATIONS
NOT
USED
IN
THIS
THESIS
 
 
 
 
 7
 
 
 
 
ABBREVIATIONS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
TABLE
OF
CONTENTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
BACKGROUND

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 Forkhead
transcription
factors
 
 
 
 
 11

 
 Transcription
factors
 
 
 
 
 
 11

 
 The
forkhead
family
of
transcription
factors
 
 
 
 11

 
 Foxf2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12

 
 Foxc2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 Obesity

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 14

 
 The
emergence
of
an
obesity
epidemic
 
 
 
 14

 
 
 
 

 Type
2
diabetes
and
insulin
signaling
 
 
 
 
 15

 
 The
development
of
type
2
diabetes
 
 
 
 15

 
 Insulin‐mediated
intracellular
signaling
 
 
 
 16

 
 Insulin
receptor
substrate
1
 
 
 
 
 17

 
 Insulin
resistance
in
skeletal
muscle
and
adipose
tissue
 
 18

 

 Adipose
tissue
vasculature
 
 
 
 
 
 21

 
 Vasculogenesis
and
angiogenesis
 
 
 
 
 21

 
 Angiogenesis
in
adipose
tissue
 
 
 
 
 21

 
 Key
players
in
adipose
tissue
angiogenesis
 
 
 
 22

 
 Angiopoietins
 
 
 
 
 
 
 22

 
 Foxc2
as
regulator
of
angiogenesis
 
 
 
 
 23

RESULTS
AND
DISCUSSION
 
 
 
 
 
 24


 Paper
I
‐
Adipocyte
overexpression
of
FOXF2
regulates


 insulin
signaling
 
 
 
 
 
 
 24

 
 The
FOXF2
transgenic
mice
model
 
 
 
 
 24

 
 Native
Foxf2
expression

 
 
 
 
 
 24

 
 FOXF2
regulates
systemic
glucose
tolerance

 
 
 26
 Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 10 
 
 FOXF2
regulates
of
genes
involved
in
insulin
resistance
 
 27

 
 FOXF2
negatively
regulates
expression
of
Irs1
 
 
 27

 
 FOXF2
reduces
insulin‐mediated
glucose
uptake
 
 
 28


 Paper
II‐
Adipocyte
overexpression
of
FOXC2
prevents

 
diet‐induced
insulin
resistance

 
 
 
 
 29

 
 FOXC2
regulates
lean
and
fat
mass
distribution
 
 
 29

 
 FOXC2
regulates
glucose
metabolism
 
 
 
 30

 
 FOXC2
regulates
skeletal
muscle
insulin
signaling
 
 
 31


 Paper
III
‐
FOXC2
regulates
angiogenesis
in
adipose
tissue
 
 33

 
 Vascular
phenotype
of
FOXC2
transgenic
mice
 
 
 33

 
 FOXC2
regulates
angiogenesis
 
 
 
 
 35

 
 FOXC2
transcriptionally
regulates
Ang‐2
expression
 
 
 36

 
 Ang‐2
mediates
the
vascular
phenotype
in
FOXC2
transgenic
mice
 36

CONCLUSIONS
AND
CONCLUDING
REMARKS
 
 
 
 37

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 
 
 
 
 
 
 39

REFERENCES
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 40


 
 

 
 


 
 


 

 
 
 


 Rickard Westergren 11 Background Forkhead transcription factors Transcription factors The phenotypic differences that distinguish the different cell types of a multicellular organism are largely due to cell specific patterns of gene expression. Regulation of transcription is important both in order to distinguish the cell type and to regulate gene activity in response to specific stimuli (D. S. Latchman, 1997). The first step of gene expression is transcription initiation, which could briefly be described as the RNA polymerase II binding to the DNA, initiating transcription in order to produce mRNA. Eukaryotic RNA polymerase, however, will not bind to a “naked” DNA sequence. Rather, it requires the presence of additional proteins known as transcription factors. A defining feature of transcription factors is that they contain one or more DNA-binding domains, capable of binding to cis-acting regulatory DNA elements (A. D. Frankel and P. S. Kim, 1991; H. F. Lodish and J. E. Darnell, 2000). Multiple transcription factors often control transcription by binding to different cis elements on a single promoter generating a complex transcriptional regulating profile (L. Chen, 1999). The crucial role of transcription factors during development as well as in adult tissues has been repeatedly demonstrated in a number of organisms through analysis of phenotypes resulting from deletions or overexpressions. That transcription factors are important genes is further supported by the fact that as much as 7 % of the total mouse genes encode transcription factors (P. A. Gray et al., 2004). The forkhead family of transcription factors Transcription factors are usually classified into families based on sequence similarities of the evolutionarily conserved DNA binding domains. All proteins of the forkhead family of transcription factors share a highly conserved 110 amino acid DNA binding domain. Since the identification of the first member in 1990, more than 100 genes have been classified into this growing gene family (P. J. Wijchers et al., 2006). Due to the inconsistent use of different names and classification systems of the forkhead proteins, a Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 12 unifying nomenclature was proposed in 1998 and the name Fox (Forkhead box) was adopted (K. H. Kaestner et al., 2000). Family members are further classified into subclasses based on sequence homology and to date there are 19 defined subclasses (A-S) (P. J. Wijchers et al., 2006). In mammals, over 40 forkhead genes have been identified. Using targeted inactivation, many of these genes have proven to be essential for proper embryonic development and survival (review in (P. Carlsson and M. Mahlapuu, 2002)). Forkhead genes have been demonstrated to play crucial roles in a variety of processes such as regulation of the immune system (P. J. Coffer and B. M. Burgering, 2004; H. Jonsson and S. L. Peng, 2005), cell-cycle regulation (W. Korver et al., 1997; R. H. Medema et al., 2000) and metabolism (D. Q. Shih et al., 1999; A. Cederberg et al., 2001; A. Barthel et al., 2005). Mutations in forkhead genes have also been linked to human disease (S. Hannenhalli and K. H. Kaestner, 2009). Foxf2 Human FOXF2 was identified in 1994 (S. Pierrou et al., 1994). FOXF2 was first demonstrated to have a relatively restricted expression located to the lung and placenta but later studies revealed a more widespread expression including mesenchyme adjacent to the epithelium in alimentary, respiratory, and urinary tracts (M. Hellqvist et al., 1996). Foxf2 mRNA has also been observed in the central nervous system, eye, ear, and limb buds (M. Aitola et al., 2000). Foxf2 -/- mice die at birth, most probably due to a cleft in the secondary palate, which causes air filling of the gastrointestinal tract interfering with the newborns ability to breathe and suckle (T. Wang et al., 2003). They display defects and malformations of the intestine including megacolon, colorectal muscle hypoplasia and agangliosis (M. Ormestad et al., 2006). Foxf2 +/- mice appear normal and are fertile (T. Wang et al., 2003). They do, however, have multilayered epithelium in the small intestine and are prone to develop intestine adenomas (Dr. Peter Carlsson, Personal communication). Human FOXF2 has been shown to be expressed in prostate and has been implicated to be involved in the development of prostate cancer (L. van der Heul-Nieuwenhuijsen et al., 2009) According to data from recent studies, Foxf2 also plays a role in metabolism, as it was shown to regulate the expression of at least 9 genes involved in glycolysis and beta- Rickard Westergren 13 oxidation (P. Philip-Couderc et al., 2008). In addition, Gerin and colleagues have shown that Foxf2 is regulated during adipogenesis and that forced expression of Foxf2 mildly stimulates adipocyte differentiation, which suggests its involvement in adipocyte metabolism (I. Gerin et al., 2009). In Paper I, we demonstrate mice overexpressing FOXF2 in an adipose tissue-restricted fashion to have significantly lower adipocyte insulin-mediated glucose uptake and to have impaired systemic glucose tolerance. Foxc2 The mouse gene Foxc2 was first detected in the non-notochordial mesoderm and in mesoderm of the trunk, head and limbs (K. H. Kaestner et al., 1993; N. Miura et al., 1993). Later studies have revealed a more widespread expression including paraxial mesoderm, where Foxc2 is proposed to be involved in the regulation of differentiation and proliferation of cells giving rise to skeleton and skull (G. E. Winnier et al., 1997). During embryonic development, Foxc2 has been implicated to be involved in vascular development and cardiovascular disease (K. N. Papanicolaou et al., 2008), which is discussed in more detail below. Foxc2 -/- mice die pre-, or perinatally with multiple skeletal and cardiovascular defects, including abnormal vascular remodeling and nonfunctioning blood vessels (G. E. Winnier et al., 1997). The Foxc2 +/- phenotype is indistinguishable from wild-type and appears healthy, although more recent studies reveal a Foxc2 +/- eye phenotype, including abnormalities in ocular drainage structures and iris hypoplasia (R. S. Smith et al., 2000). Heterozygous mutations in FOXC2 in humans cause lymphedema distichiasis syndrome, a dominantly inherited primary lymphedema (LD, OMIM #153400) (J. Fang et al., 2000; R. Bell et al., 2001). Lymphedema distichiasis syndrome is characterized by lymphedema, double rows of eyelashes (distichiasis), cardiac defects, cleft palate, renal disease and diabetes (S. M. Johnson et al., 1999; C. Yildirim-Toruner et al., 2004). FOXC2 is also expressed in adipose tissue and has been demonstrated to be a powerful regulator of adipocyte metabolism (A. Cederberg et al., 2001). Transgenic overexpression of FOXC2 in white (WAT) and brown adipose tissue (BAT) has pleiotropic effects on gene expression in mice, leading to protection against diet- Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 14 induced insulin resistance. FOXC2 transgenic mice also experience decreased total body lipid content, lower levels of serum triglycerides and reduced plasma levels of free fatty acids (FFAs) (A. Cederberg et al., 2001). A possible role of FOXC2 as regulator of metabolic efficiency is suggested as Foxc2 expression is triggered by high-fat diet. In paper II, we demonstrate that FOXC2 transgenic mice are protected from diet-induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle and liver. We furthermore show this to be accompanied with decreased intracellular levels of FFA metabolites. Obesity The emergence of an obesity epidemic Obesity can be defined as a disease in which excess body fat has accumulated to such an extent that health may be negatively affected. The prevalence of obesity increases rapidly in many countries and is now reaching endemic proportions in some areas. The WHO estimates that more than one billion people are overweight, and of these over 300 million are considered obese (J. C. Seidell, 2000). Obesity is not only a problem of western societies as is also seen in many developing countries. Genetic susceptibility, increased availability of high-energy food and insufficient physical activity leads to alarming rates of obesity. As a consequence it has been estimated that in year 2030, 366 million people will suffer from type 2 diabetes (T2D) (S. Wild et al., 2004). A term often used when discussing the risks connected with obesity is the metabolic syndrome; also known as insulin resistance syndrome, dysmetabolic syndrome or syndrome X. The metabolic syndrome is characterized by visceral obesity, insulin resistance, hypertension, chronic inflammation and thrombotic disorders (M. Korbonits and S. Karger (Firm), 2008). The concept of the metabolic syndrome was introduced as a diagnostic tool to identify individuals at risk of developing T2D and cardiovascular disease and is now often used in predictions of the obesity epidemic (P. Bjorntorp, 1992) (G. M. Reaven, 1988) (G. M. Reaven, 2005). Since increased adiposity is associated with many of the key components of the metabolic syndrome, obesity has been described as the central factor in the development of the metabolic syndrome. Rickard Westergren 15 Type 2 diabetes and insulin signaling The development of type 2 diabetes T2D is caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors and are characterized by insufficient pancreatic insulin secretion and impaired peripheral insulin sensitivity. Although development of T2D is a highly complex process a general multi-step model has been described (Figure 1). The first step of this proposed model includes impaired insulin-mediated glucose uptake and failure of insulin to suppress hepatic glucose production. Prolonged high levels of plasma glucose lead to the development of insulin resistance in peripheral tissues, including liver, skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, as a consequence β-cells in the pancreas increase insulin secretion. The β-cells finally fails to produce enough insulin to overcome the insulin resistance which leads to hyperglycemia and in the end overt T2D (M. F. Saad et al., 1991). Figure
1.
Progression
of
Type
2
diabetes.

Development
 of
 type
 2
 diabetes
 (T2D)
 is
 preceded
 by
 progressive
 insulin
 resistance
 in
peripheral
 tissues,
 followed
 by
 an
 enhanced
 insulin
 secretion
 as
 well
 as
 reduced
 insulin
clearance
 in
 the
 liver.
 Finally,
 the
 pancreatic
 β‐cells
 fails
 to
 compensate
 for
 the
 insulin
resistance,
leading
to
impaired
glucose
tolerance
and
eventually
development
of
overt
T2D.
 Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 16 As described in this pathophysiologic model, insulin resistance is a key event in the development of T2D. Several factors secreted from adipose tissue have been proposed to mediate a link between obesity and insulin resistance, for example tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) (K. T. Uysal et al., 1997), resistin (C. M. Steppan et al., 2001), leptin (V. A. Barr et al., 1997), adiponectin (E. Hu et al., 1996) and FFAs (G. I. Shulman, 2000). Insulin-mediated intracellular signaling Insulin is a key anabolic hormone. Upon binding to specific surface receptors it triggers a complex intracellular signaling cascade, mainly leading to a cellular redistribution of glucose transporter 4 (Glut4). This subsequently triggers the transport of glucose from the blood into tissues (D. E. James et al., 1988). Insulin signaling is controlled by negative feedback, whereby downstream components inhibit upstream events (P. Gual et al., 2003). Alternatively, signals from other pathways can inhibit or enhance insulin signaling (Y. Zick, 2005). The insulin receptor (IR) belongs to the family of tyrosine kinase receptors that become autophosphorylated at multiple tyrosine residues upon ligand binding. This leads to the activation of an intrinsic tyrosine kinase that, in turn, can phosphorylate members of the insulin receptor substrate family (M. F. White, 1997). The most studied member of the family of insulin receptor substrates is insulin receptor substrate 1 (Irs1). The activated IR phosphorylates Irs1 on multiple tyrosine residues, which then serves as docking sites for proteins containing Src-homology-2 domains; the most important being the regulatory p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K). The binding of the PI3K p85 subunit to Irs1 activates the catalytic PI3K p110 subunit, which promotes the recruitment of PI3K to the plasma membrane. There it catalyses the phosphorylation of specific phospholipids, phosphoinositides, on the 3-position to produce phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphates (PIP3). The local insulin-induced increase in PIP3 results in the recruitment of phosphoinositide-dependent kinase (PDK1) and protein kinase B (PKB, also called Akt), the latter being one of the most important signaling mediators in metabolic insulin signaling. PIP3 dependent activation of PDK1 mediates the phosphorylation of PKB/Akt Thr308, one of the sites critical for activation of PKB/Akt (D. R. Alessi et al., 1996). PIP3 is also required for Rickard Westergren 17 phosphorylation of Ser473 on PKB/Akt by mTOR (D. D. Sarbassov et al., 2005). Activated PKB/Akt directly regulates a number of intracellular substrates important for glucose, protein and fat metabolism (Figure 2) (E. L. Whiteman et al., 2002; C. M. Taniguchi et al., 2006). Insulin receptor substrate 1 The importance of Irs1 in insulin signaling is demonstrated by the phenotype of the Irs1 gene knockout mice, which exhibit impaired glucose tolerance, increased serum triglycerides and hypertension (H. Tamemoto et al., 1994; H. Abe et al., 1998). Irs1 +/- mice also present impaired glucose tolerance when given a high-fat diet (A. Shirakami et al., 2002). Impaired tyrosine phosphorylation of Irs1 has been noted in animal models of insulin resistance (M. J. Saad et al., 1992). Sequence analysis of the IRS1 gene in humans has revealed polymorphisms with higher frequency in T2D. For example the transition Gly-Arg at position 972 has shown to associate with T2D in some ethnic groups (G. A. Hitman et al., 1995). Functional studies of these patients have shown decreased activity of PKB/Akt due to defective IRS1 PI3 kinase association (M. L. Hribal et al., 2000). Furthermore, in cultured adipocytes, addition of known insulin resistance promoting proteins TNFα and interleukin-6 (IL-6) lead to decreased expression of Irs1 (V. Rotter et al., 2003) The phosphorylation pattern of Irs1 is crucial for its function. Irs1 contains 21 putative tyrosine phosphorylation sites and more than 30 potential serine/threonine phosphorylation sites (M. F. White, 1997). Ser/Thr phosphorylation of Irs1 has shown to affect the binding of Irs1 to plasma membrane, induction of Irs1 protein degradation and inhibition of docking and binding of downstream effectors (S. Boura-Halfon and Y. Zick, 2009). Several known inducers of insulin resistance such as TNFα, FFAs and cellular stress, have all shown to promote Ser/Thr Irs1 phosphorylation (G. S. Hotamisligil et al., 1996) (E. W. Kraegen et al., 2001) (K. E. Wellen and G. S. Hotamisligil, 2005). Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 18 Figure
2.
The
Irs­dependent
insulin
signaling
pathway.

Insulin
binding
to
the
 insulin
receptor
(IR)
results
 in
phosphorylation
of
tyrosine
residues
on
the
receptor,
which
promotes
phosphorylation
of
IR
substrates
such
as
insulin
receptor
substrate
 1
 (IRS1).
 Docking
 of
 the
 regulatory
 subunit
 (p85)
 of
 PI3
 kinase
 (PI3K)
 to
phosphotyrosine
 residues
 of
 IRS1
 activates
 its
 serine/threonine
 kinase
 activity
 and
 the
phosphorylation
 cascade
 involving
 phosphoinositide‐dependent
 kinase
 1
 (PDK1),
mammalian
target
of
rapamycin
(mTOR)
and
protein
kinase
B
(PKB/Akt).
For
more
detailed
description
see
text.

 Insulin resistance in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue Skeletal muscle is the major site for insulin-mediated glucose uptake. In vivo studies have shown that skeletal muscle is responsible for as much as 80-90 % of the total insulin-mediated glucose uptake (D. Thiebaud et al., 1982). Skeletal muscle insulin resistance has been shown to be tightly linked to T2D. The concepts of the development of insulin resistance in skeletal muscle are related to alterations in the insulin signaling transduction pathway, including for example decreased Irs1 protein content, effects on Irs1 phosphorylation, reduced PI3K activity or altered protein expression of the regulatory subunit of PI3K (L. Pirola et al., 2004) (A. R. Saltiel and C. R. Kahn, 2001). Alterations in the expression and/or translocation of Glut4 to the plasma membrane have also been implicated to contribute to impaired skeletal muscle insulin response (A. E. Stenbit et al., 1997). Rickard Westergren 19 Several studies in both human and animal models have shown a strong inverse relationship between intracellular myocyte fat content and insulin sensitivity (G. Boden et al., 2001) (M. Krssak et al., 1999; J. K. Kim et al., 2001). In addition, mice deficient in specific fatty acid transporters (e.g. FAT/CD36 and FATP1) show decreased fatty acid uptake and exhibit improved insulin sensitivity (T. Hajri et al., 2002; J. K. Kim et al., 2004). Several theories on the effect of elevated levels of FFAs in the development of insulin resistance in skeletal muscle have been proposed. Previously, FFAs was suggested to compete with glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle, leading to insulin resistance and reduced glycogen synthesis when present at high levels (the so called Randle cycle) (P. J. Randle et al., 1963). Figure
3.
Mechanism
of
FFA­induced
insulin
resistance
in
skeletal
muscle.
An
increase
 in
delivery
of
 free
 fatty
acids
(FFAs)
to
muscle
or
a
decrease
 in
 intramuscular
FFA
 metabolism
 leads
 to
 an
 increase
 in
 intramuscular
 FFA
 metabolites
 such
 as
diacylglycerol
 (DAG),
 fatty
 acyl
 CoA
 and
 ceramides.
 Increased
 intracellular
 levels
 of
 these
metabolites
activates
protein
kinase
Cθ
 (PKCθ),
 c‐Jun
amino‐terminal
kinase
(JNK)
and/or
inhibiting
 κB
 kinase‐β
 (IKK‐β)
 promoting
 phosphorylation
 of
 serine/threonine
 sites
 on
insulin
receptor
substrates
1
and
2
 (IRS1/2).
This
 in
 turn
reduces
 the
ability
of
 IRS1/2
 to
activate
 phosphatidylinositol
 3‐kinase
 (PI3K).
 
 This
 subsequently
 decreases
 glucose
transport
 by
 inhibiting
 translocation
 of
 glucose
 transporter
 4
 (GLUT4)
 to
 the
 plasma
membrane
and
inhibiting
activity
of
glycogen
synthase
(GS).
Glucose‐6‐phosphatase
(G6P),
Uridine
diphosphate
glucose
(UDP‐Glucose).

Adapted
from
(G.
I.
Shulman,
2000)
 Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 20 However, more recent studies have gained deeper insight into the induction of insulin resistance by increased availability of FFAs (G. I. Shulman, 2000). FFA-induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle is associated with activation of protein kinase Cθ (PKCθ) (C. Yu et al., 2002), interfering with the insulin signaling cascade with reduced insulin-mediated Irs1 tyrosine phosphorylation and reduced Irs1 associated PI3 kinase activity (M. E. Griffin et al., 1999). This correlates well with the observation that obese insulin resistant human subjects exhibit increased intramuscular activity of PKCθ (S. I. Itani et al., 2000). Several other mediators, such as, κB kinase-β (IKK-β) and c-Jun amino-terminal kinase (JNK), have also been suggested to mediate FFA-induced insulin resistance (M. Yuan et al., 2001; J. Hirosumi et al., 2002) (Figure 3). Historically, adipose tissue has been considered to be a relatively passive energy-storing organ. However, the adipose tissue is now also recognized as a major endocrine organ, secreting factors that play an important role in appetite regulation, energy homeostasis and development of insulin resistance (B. M. Spiegelman and J. S. Flier, 1996). There are several possible links between adipose tissue function and insulin resistance in other organs, such as, resistin (C. M. Steppan et al., 2001), adiponectin (T. Yamauchi et al., 2001), leptin (K. F. Petersen et al., 2002) and TNFα (G. S. Hotamisligil et al., 1993). Perhaps the most obvious link is the regulation of FFA delivery from the adipose tissue to the rest of the body. Simplistically, an expanding adipose tissue mass delivers more FFA into the bloodstream to be utilized by, for example, skeletal muscle as discussed above. The increased FFA release from adipose tissue also promotes insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells, contributing to the hyperinsulinaemia seen in subjects with insulin resistance (Y. Itoh et al., 2003). In papers I and II, we show that adipocyte overexpression of two forkhead transcription factors, Foxf2 and Foxc2, regulates peripheral insulin signaling. Rickard Westergren 21 Adipose tissue vasculature Vasculogenesis and angiogenesis The formation of the vascular network is vital for embryonic development as well as in postnatal life. This process can be divided into two separate events. The formation of new vessels is called vasculogenesis, while angiogenesis refers to the formation of new vessels from already existing ones (S. F. Gilbert et al., 2006). Briefly, vasculogenesis can be described as undifferentiated endothelial cells, referred to as angioblasts, upon the influence of external stimuli differentiate into mature endothelial cells in order to form the primitive capillary plexus (S. W. Jin and C. Patterson, 2009). It was generally thought that vasculogenesis only occurred in the developing embryo, but recent data suggests that new vessels are also formed in the adult organism. Circulating endothelial progenitor cells is found to be able to contribute, to varying degrees, to the formation of new blood vessels, for example during events such as tumor growth or to the revascularization process following trauma (D. Ribatti et al., 2001) (W. Tang et al., 2008). The main triggering events of postnatal vasculogenesis are thought to be increased demand for delivery of oxygen and pro- or anti-angiogenetic agents. The process of angiogenesis can be divided into two types. Sprouting angiogenesis refers the process where endothelial cells escape from the vessel wall and migrate into the surrounding tissue towards a source of angiogenic stimuli (P. H. Burri et al., 2004). The second type of angiogenesis is called intussusceptive angiogenesis or splitting angiogenesis, where endothelial cells from the vessel wall extend into the lumen, in order to split a single vessel in two (A. N. Makanya et al., 2009). Angiogenesis in adipose tissue Unlike most tissues, adipose tissue constantly undergoes expansion and regression. This requires a continuous remodeling of the tissue vasculature in order to adapt to the new tissue size and demands (G. J. Hausman and R. L. Richardson, 2004). In expanding adipose tissue the formation of new blood vessels contributes both to adipocyte hyperplasia (the generation of more adipocytes) and adipocyte hypertrophy (increasing the size of already existing adipocytes). The vessels supply the newly formed tissue with nutrients and oxygen as well as growth factors and cytokines. Furthermore the Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 22 vessel network also supplies the expanding tissue with circulating stem cells, derived mainly from the bone marrow. These stem cells have the capacity to differentiate into preadipocytes, adipocytes and vascular cells (Y. Cao, 2007). BAT is one of the most highly vascularized tissues in the body. The ample perfusion of BAT provides brown adipocytes with high amounts of oxygen and substrates needed for thermogenesis. Furthermore the dense vasculature provides a means to dissipate the heat generated to the rest of the body. A tissue specific feature of BAT is the ability to activate angiogenesis in response to cold exposure (Y. Xue et al., 2009). Key Players in adipose tissue angiogenesis Angiogenesis is a highly complex process and several regulatory systems are involved in the balance of promoting and inhibiting vessel formation. The main players in adipose tissue angiogenesis are vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) and its receptors (VEGFR) (G. Neufeld et al., 1999) (M. Papetti and I. M. Herman, 2002). VEGF have been shown to be a highly potent stimulator of angiogenesis when binding to the VEGFR. VEGF binding gives rise to a complex intracellular signaling cascade which leads to stimulation of vessel permeability, proliferation and migration of immature endothelial cells (G. Neufeld et al., 1999). VEGF expression is influenced by a number of factors, including hypoxia, insulin and several cytokines (S. Liekens et al., 2001). Many negatively acting regulators of angiogenesis have also been described, such as proliferin-related protein (D. Jackson et al., 1994), angiostatin (M. S. O'Reilly et al., 1994) and endostatin (M. S. O'Reilly et al., 1997). Angipoietins Some 15 years ago a second family of growth factors, termed angiopoietins, was described. To date, four members of this family have been identified (Angiopoietin 1-4)(S. Davis et al., 1996; P. C. Maisonpierre et al., 1997; D. M. Valenzuela et al., 1999)). They all act by binding to two tyrosine kinase receptors (Tie-1 and Tie-2), which are expressed by vascular and lymphatic endothelial cells. Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) and Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) are specific ligands of the Tie-2 receptor. Tie-2 activation promotes vessel assembly and maturation which involves the interactions between endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells (vSMC) / pericytes, which, amongst Rickard Westergren 23 other things, are important for developing and maintaining a mature vessel structure (N. Jones et al., 2001) Ang-1 promotes maturation and stabilization of vessels (D. Hanahan, 1997; G. D. Yancopoulos et al., 2000), while Ang-2 serves as an Ang-1 antagonist and is expressed at sites of vascular remodeling (G. Thurston, 2003). Ang-2 plays a complex role in the regulation of vascular remodeling and its function depends on expression of other angiogenic stimuli. In the presence of VEGF, Ang-2 promotes angiogenic sprouting, while in the absence of VEGF, Ang-2 contributes to vascular regression (J. Holash et al., 1999). Increased expression of Ang-2 is observed during adipose tissue growth, supporting the notion that adipose tissue development requires continuous remodeling, maturation and pattering of the vasculature (J. V. Silha et al., 2005). Increased levels of Ang-2 have also been observed during hypoxia (H. Oh et al., 1999; P. Pichiule et al., 2004) as well as in pathological conditions, for example in the endothelium of different types of tumors (L. Zhang et al., 2003; J. Oliner et al., 2004). Mice with transgenic overexpression of Ang-2 display severe vascular defects including disruption of vessel integrity (P. C. Maisonpierre et al., 1997), highly reminiscent of the phenotype of Ang-1 deficient mice (C. Suri et al., 1996). Further strengthening the hypothesis that Ang-2 exerts antagonistic function on Ang-1/Tie-2 signaling are observations that endothelial specific overexpression of Ang-2 in adult mice leads to a complete suppression of Ang-1 mediated Tie-2 signaling (Y. Reiss et al., 2007). Foxc2 as regulator of angiogenesis It has previously been shown that Foxc2 is involved in the regulation of embryonic development, where it is required for remodeling of the branchial arch arteries in order to form the aortic arch (K. Iida et al., 1997; G. E. Winnier et al., 1999). Foxc2 also has been shown to have important functions in lymphatic vasculature and mutations in the human FOXC2 gene are responsible for lymhedema distichiasis as previously discussed. Furthermore, the phenotype seen in Foxc2 +/- mice mimics several of the features seen in humans with lymphedema-distichiasis syndrome (B. M. Kriederman et al., 2003). Apart from this, recent research has pointed out Foxc2 as an important regulator of angiogenesis in adipose tissue, where it directly affects several proteins in remodeling, maturation and function of blood and lymph vessels (B. M. Kriederman et al., 2003; S. L. Dagenais et al., 2004). New data has revealed two cell surface molecules Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 24 present in vascular endothelial cells to serve as direct Foxc2 downstream targets. Promoters of both chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) and integrin β3 are activated upon Foxc2 binding, supplying strong evidence that Foxc2 is directly involved in angiogenesis (H. Hayashi and T. Kume, 2008; H. Hayashi et al., 2008). In Paper III we describe the angiogenetic phenotype of mice overexpressing FOXC2 in adipose tissue. We furthermore provide mechanistic insight showing FOXC2 to directly control Ang-2 expression. Rickard Westergren 25 Results and discussion Paper I – Adipocyte overexpression of FOXF2 regulates insulin signaling Numerous forkhead proteins have been shown to be expressed in adipose tissue and regulating glucose metabolism e.g. FOXC2, FOXO1 and FOXA2 (A. Cederberg et al., 2001; C. Wolfrum et al., 2003; J. Nakae et al., 2008). The FOXF2 transgenic mice model In the current study we have, by screening of a human adipocyte cDNA library, shown that forkhead transcription factor F2 (FOXF2) is expressed is adipocytes. To investigate the role of FOXF2 in vivo we decided to create transgenic mice overexpressing FOXF2 in adipose tissue. We made a DNA construct in which the adipose-specific aP2 (N. R. Coe et al., 1999) enhancer/promoter, known to promote transcription in WAT and BAT in vivo (S. R. Ross et al., 1990), was fused to a cDNA encoding FOXF2. This construct was injected into male pronucleus of (C57BL/6J x CBA) F1 zygotes, cultured overnight and transferred to pseudopregnant females, producing mice overexpressing FOXF2 in adipose tissue (Figure 2A, Paper I). The FOXF2 transgenic mice appeared to develop normally and to be normal regarding general behaviour and reproduction. No significant difference in terms of weight curves, adiposity, adipocyte size or food intake could be observed (Unpublished data). Native Foxf2 expression Using quantitative real time PCR we detected the native expression of Foxf2 in various fat depots and other tissues known to be involved in glucose metabolism. In all examined WAT depots (abdominal, inguinal and perirenal) and BAT, significant amounts of Foxf2 expression could be detected (Figure 1A, Paper I). However, no substantial Foxf2 expression was observed in pancreas, liver or skeletal muscle. To eliminate the possibility that the Foxf2 expression seen in adipose tissue originating from other cell types than the adipocyte, we measured the relative expression levels of Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 26 Foxf2 in adipocyte and stromal-vascular fraction. Foxf2 mRNA was significantly more abundant in adipocytes compared with adipose tissue stromal-vascular cells (Figure 1C, Paper I). Since the expression of several other forkhead genes have shown to be regulated during adipogenesis (I. Gerin et al., 2009), we decided to study Foxf2 expression during a prolonged differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells. Foxf2 expression displays a biphasic profile peaking at 4 and 18 days after differentiation start (Figure 1B, Paper I). FOXF2 regulates systemic glucose tolerance Overexpression of other forkhead genes in an adipocyte-restricted manner has been shown affect whole body glucose metabolism (A. Cederberg et al., 2001), therefore we set out to study whether a similar phenotype was present in the FOXF2 transgenic mice. Using an intravenous glucose tolerance test, we investigated the response to an intravenously administrated glucose load. No significant difference in plasma glucose levels could be observed when comparing FOXF2 transgenic mice with wild-type littermates (Figure 2B, Paper I). However, FOXF2 transgenic mice secreted significantly more insulin in response to a given glucose load (Figure 2C, Paper I). They were also less efficient in eliminating blood glucose when given a fixed dose of insulin, as determined by glucose plasma levels (Figure 2D, Paper I). These observations suggest that FOXF2 transgenic mice have impaired insulin signaling. To study if FOXF2 affects adipocyte glucose uptake by direct regulation of glucose transport, expression of glucose transporters 1 and 4 (Glut1, Glut4) was measured in WAT and differentiated mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) from wild-type and FOXF2 transgenic mice (unpublished data). No significant difference in expression of glucose transporters could be detected in FOXF2 transgenic mice when compared with wild-type littermates, which indicates the impaired insulin-mediated glucose uptake of the FOXF2 transgenic mice to involve other mechanisms than lower expression of glucose transporters. Based on the observation that other forkhead genes have been shown to be regulated by a high-fat diet and to be involved in the development of diet-induced insulin resistance (A. Cederberg et al., 2001) (J. K. Kim et al., 2005), we measured Foxf2 steady state mRNA levels in WAT from mice after 8 weeks of high-fat diet (35.9 Rickard Westergren 27 % fat). A significant increase in Foxf2 expression could be detected in WAT from high-fat fed mice as compared with mice fed standard chow (4 % fat) (Figure 7, Paper I). This indicates that diet-induced alterations in Foxf2 expression could contribute to the development of insulin resistance in adipose tissue, and possibly also systemically. FOXF2 regulates genes involved in insulin resistance To further study the role of FOXF2 as a metabolic regulator in adipose tissue we quantified mRNA levels of genes known to regulate adipocyte metabolism (Figure 3, Paper I). Several genes known to be involved in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance, including Irs1, perilipin (J. T. Tansey et al., 2001; P. K. Saha et al., 2004), Acrp30 (adiponectin) (A. H. Berg et al., 2001; T. Yamauchi et al., 2001; C. Menzaghi et al., 2002) and carnitine palmitoyltransferase 2 (Cpt2) (J. P. Bonnefont et al., 2004) were all significantly downregulated in WAT from FOXF2 transgenic mice. The expression of sterol regulatory element binding protein 1 (Srebp1) (T. F. Osborne, 2000) however was significantly upregulated. Since the insulin secretion phenotype of FOXF2 transgenic mice appeared to be isolated to the early phase of insulin secretion, we decided to study the regulation of Irs1 further. FOXF2 negatively regulates expression of Irs1 There is a firm body of evidence that regulation of Irs1 is involved in the development of insulin resistance and T2D. Low levels of mRNA and protein levels of IRS1 in human adipocytes have been proposed to be predictive of insulin resistance and T2D (E. Carvalho et al., 2001). Some human IRS1 mutations have also been shown to be associated with impaired insulin signaling (J. O. Clausen et al., 1995). Apart from Irs1 mRNA levels being significantly reduced in WAT from FOXF2 transgenic mice (Figure 3A, Paper I) we could also, as judged by western blots, detect a downregulation of IRS1 protein levels in response to enhanced levels of FOXF2, in both WAT (Figure 4A, Paper I) and MEF adipocytes (Figure 4B, Paper I). Phosphorylation of the IRS1 protein has been described as a key step in insulin signaling under both physiological and pathological conditions (J. F. Tanti et al., 1994; Y. Zick, 2005) (B. Draznin, 2006). The fact that serine/threonine phosphorylation of IRS1 impairs its ability to associate with the insulin receptor, subsequently inhibiting Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 28 insulin-mediated stimulated glucose uptake (K. Paz et al., 1997), made us study the phosphorylation pattern of IRS1 in WAT from FOXF2 transgenic mice and wild-type littermates. Previous studies have shown that increased phosphorylation of both Ser307 (L. Rui et al., 2001) and Ser612 (K. De Fea and R. A. Roth, 1997) inhibiting IRS1 mediated insulin signaling. Using western blot we could detect lower levels of both phosphorylated IRS1 Ser307 (Figure 5B, Paper I) and IRS1 Ser612 (Figure 5C, Paper I) as could be expected due to lower levels of IRS1 protein (Figures 4A and 5A, Paper I). The same level of downregulation of IRS1 tyrosine phosphorylation was also observed (Figure 5D, Paper I). Since the decrease of IRS1 phosphorylation seen in transgenic mice is fully explained by the reduced levels of IRS1 protein, we suggest that any effect on insulin signaling seen in transgenic mice is due to lower total levels of IRS1 protein rather than an altered pattern of IRS1 phosphorylation. FOXF2 reduces insulin-mediated glucose uptake Is the impaired insulin mediated glucose uptake seen in FOXF2 transgenic mice a consequence of effects on adipocyte insulin signaling? To address this question, we studied insulin-mediated glucose uptake in differentiated MEFs derived from FOXF2 transgenic and wild-type mice. In the range of physiological insulin levels, a significant reduction (~25 %) in glucose uptake was detected for FOXF2 transgenic adipocytes as compared to wild-type adipocytes (Figure 6, Paper I). An observation that could be compared to the ~50 % reduction in insulin-mediated glucose uptake seen in adipocytes from Irs1 deficient mice (Y. Kaburagi et al., 1997). Rickard Westergren 29 Paper II – Adipocyte overexpression of FOXC2 prevents diet-induced insulin resistance Many techniques have been deployed in order to study insulin signaling in peripheral insulin responding tissues. However hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp technique is considered to be the golden standard for measuring insulin action in vivo (R. A. DeFronzo et al., 1979). With this technique, a constant rate of insulin is infused intravenously in order to increase the uptake of circulating blood glucose and inhibiting endogenous glucose production by the liver. The decline in plasma glucose is prevented by a variable rate of intravenous glucose infusion. The amount of exogenous glucose required to maintain plasma glucose at its initial level is quantified by the glucose infusion rate. Since as much as 80–90 % of the infused glucose is taken up by skeletal muscle, insulin sensitivity measured with this technique primarily reflects skeletal muscle metabolism (D. Thiebaud et al., 1982). Clamp experiments can be significantly enhanced by the use of glucose tracers. Glucose can be radioactively labeled and the concentration of glucose metabolites can be detected in individual organs after finished clamp experiments. Mice overexpressing FOXC2 have previously been shown to be protected from diet-induced obesity and glucose intolerance (A. Cederberg et al., 2001). In order to study the effect of FOXC2 overexpression on tissue-specific glucose metabolism and insulin signaling in vivo, we subjected mice to a hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp experiment. Studies were performed on FOXC2 transgenic and wild-type mice, before and after 3 weeks of high fat feeding. FOXC2 regulates lean and fat mass distribution As a first step, we set out to explore whole-body lean and fat mass distribution in FOXC2 transgenic compared with wild-type mice. We have previously shown, by comparing the mass of dissected fat depots, that FOXC2 transgenic mice have altered adipose tissue distribution and morphology (A. Cederberg et al., 2001). They have enlarged interscapular BAT depots whereas the intraabdominal WAT depot is clearly reduced in size and displays a more "brownish" color. These features are most probably due to a FOXC2 dependent regulation of adipocyte gene expression. WAT from FOXC2 transgenic mice displays a more BAT like phenotype with upregulated Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 30 expression of genes associated with mitochondrial function and biogenesis, e.g. cythochrome oxidase subunit II (coxII) and PPARγ coactivator 1 (PGC-1). Significant expression of the BAT specific gene uncoupling protein 1 (Ucp1) is also seen in WAT from FOXC2 transgenic mice (A. Cederberg et al., 2001). Using electron microscopy it was shown that WAT adipocytes from FOXC2 transgenic mice contained more and larger mitochondria as compared with wild-type adipocytes (A. Cederberg et al., 2001). In the current study, we could by using 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy estimate FOXC2 transgenic mice to have significantly lower whole-body fat mass and higher whole-body lean mass than weight matched wild-type littermates (Figure 1AB, Paper II). After 3 weeks on high-fat diet, transgenic mice had gained significantly less whole-body fat mass but more whole-body lean mass than wild-type mice (Figure 1AB, Paper II), a result that can be explained by the elevated adipocyte metabolism seen in FOXC2 transgenic mice. FOXC2 regulates glucose metabolism The failure of insulin to inhibit hepatic glucose production (HGP) is a basic feature of insulin resistance in the liver and a major factor contributing to the hyperglycemia seen in T2D. On standard chow (4 % fat), HGP rates did not differ between the FOXC2 transgenic and wild-type mice. However, following high-fat diet (55 % fat), typical signs of liver insulin resistance with significantly blunted insulin-mediated suppression of HGP could be observed in wild-type mice, while FOXC2 transgenic mice appear, at least to some extend, to be protected from diet-induced insulin resistance in the liver (Figure 1D, Paper II). Whole-body glucose turnover gives an indication of the rate at which glucose is eliminated from the blood stream and is defined as the ratio of the glucose infusion rate and plasma glucose levels at the end of the clamp experiment. As could be expected, insulin-mediated whole-body glucose turnover was significantly decreased in wild-type mice on high-fat diet, indicating impaired insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (Figure 2A, Paper II). In contrast, FOXC2 transgenic mice seem to be completely protected from diet-induced decrease in whole-body glucose uptake, indicating a less affected insulin signaling pathway (Figure 2A, Paper II). Rickard Westergren 31 Based on the notion that the skeletal muscle takes up most of the infused glucose, levels of glucose transferred to the skeletal muscle and stored in the form of glycogen were detected using ion-exchange chromatography (as described in (H. J. Kim et al., 2004)). No significant difference in skeletal muscle glucose uptake could be observed when comparing FOXC2 transgenic and wild-type mice fed standard chow. FOXC2 transgenic mice however seem to have a moderately affected skeletal muscle glucose uptake following high-fat diet as could be compared with the ~40 % decrease in glucose uptake seen in wild-type mice. This indicates that FOXC2 transgenic mice are to some extent protected from diet-induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle. FOXC2 regulates skeletal muscle insulin signaling Obesity and T2D are usually associated with elevated levels of circulating free fatty acids, leading to accumulation of fatty acid metabolites in skeletal muscle. This subsequently leads to fat-induced skeletal muscle insulin resistance for which several possible mechanisms have been proposed (L. A. Consitt et al., 2009). Recent studies have shown fat-induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle to involve elevated levels of intramuscular fatty acyl CoA leading to activation of PKC-θ (C. Yu et al., 2002). Activation of PKC-θ promotes Irs1 serine phosphorylation, which eventually interferes with its ability to activate PI3 kinase leading to impaired insulin signaling and insulin resistance. In the current study we measured Irs1-associated PI3 kinase activity and fatty acyl CoA concentrations in skeletal muscle from both FOXC2 transgenic and wild-type mice, before and after high-fat diet. Irs1-associated PI3 kinase activity was shown to be markedly reduced in wild-type skeletal muscle as an effect of high-fat diet (Figure 3C, Paper II). In contrast, skeletal muscle from FOXC2 transgenic mice show moderately affected Irs1-associated PI3 kinase activity. Using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), intramuscular fatty acid content in dissected quadriceps was detected by concentrations of fatty acyl CoA. Total fatty acyl CoA concentrations did not differ between wild-type and FOXC2 transgenic mice on standard chow. In contrast, following high-fat diet levels of individual long-chain fatty acyl CoA (C16:0, C16:1, Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 32 C18:0, C18:1, C18:2 and C18:3) as well as total fatty acyl CoA were significantly lower in FOXC2 transgenic mice as compared with wild-type mice (Figure 4B, Paper III). We show that the protective phenotype from diet-induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle, seen in the FOXC2 transgenic mice is associated with normal levels of intramuscular fatty acyl CoA following high-fat feeding. We would like to propose this to be, at least in part, due to elevated adipocyte metabolism (A. Cederberg et al., 2001) in which FFAs are mainly metabolized by the adipose tissue. This in turn prevents their accumulation in the skeletal muscle. The elevated metabolism seen in adipocytes from FOXC2 transgenic mice includes increased adipocyte expression of perisome proliferators-activated receptor-γ (PPAR-γ). Studies have shown PPAR-γ agonist rosiglitazone to improve insulin resistance in skeletal muscle in A-ZIP/F-1 lipodystrophic mice by redirecting FFAs to the liver rather then the skeletal muscle (J. K. Kim et al., 2003). The increase expression of PPAR-γ seen in FOXC2 transgenic mice most probably contributes to the redistribution of FFA from the liver and skeletal muscle towards the adipose tissue. The characteristics of the FOXC2 transgenic metabolic phenotype resemble those of mice lacking protein-tyrosine phosphatase-1B (PTP-1B), which have been shown to exhibit lower body fat stores, increased energy expenditure, altered glucose homeostasis and enhanced skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity (L. D. Klaman et al., 2000). However, the increased metabolic rate in the PTP-1B mice has been shown to be mainly due to the upregulation of mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle rather than altered adipocyte metabolism. Rickard Westergren 33 Paper III – FOXC2 regulates angiogenesis in adipose tissue The growth of adipose tissue mass leading to obesity is associated with both enlarged size and increased numbers of adipocytes. Associated with the ability of adipose tissue to grow and regress is its vasculatures capacity to adapt and meet metabolic needs (Y. Cao). Forkhead proteins have previously been shown to be directly or indirectly involved in the development of the vascular system (T. Hosaka et al., 2004; M. Potente et al., 2005; S. Seo et al., 2006) (Z. Wang et al., 2007). Members of at least five different subfamilies of forkhead transcription factors are expressed in endothelial cells or their precursors (K. N. Papanicolaou et al., 2008). One example is FoxO1, where FoxO1-null embryos die embryonically as a consequence of incomplete vascular development (T. Hosaka et al., 2004). Foxc2 has previously been implicated as a regulator of vascular development (K. N. Papanicolaou et al., 2008) and during embryonic development, Foxc2 is required for proper development and remodeling of both blood vessels and lymphatic vasculature (S. Seo et al., 2006) (T. V. Petrova et al., 2004). In the present study we describe the vascular phenotype of transgenic mice overexpressing FOXC2 in adipocytes. We also describe the role of FOXC2 in vascular development in adipose tissue and findings that FOXC2 act as a direct regulator of Ang-2 expression. Vascular phenotype of FOXC2 transgenic mice The phenotype of mice overexpressing FOXC2 in adipose tissue includes reduced size of the intraabdominal WAT depot in a combination with it having a more brownish color (A. Cederberg et al., 2001). Electron microscopy examination revealed an increased number and size of mitochondria in WAT from FOXC2 trangenes. Activation of the adrenergic/cAMP/protein kinase A signaling pathway in combination with the observation that FOXC2 transgenic WAT consumes significantly more oxygen (4-fold) suggests an elevated metabolism in FOXC2 transgenic mice compared with wild-type littermates (A. Cederberg et al., 2001). With increased metabolism comes increased demands regarding for example metabolite exchange, transport of adipokines and hormones. With this in mind we decided to perform immunohistochemical analysis of Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 34 epididymal and inguinal WAT as well as interscapular BAT from FOXC2 transgenic and wild-type mice. Using an anti-CD31 antibody specific for endothelial cells, we could show a significant increase (2- to 3-fold) in vascular density in both WAT and BAT from FOXC2 transgenic mice (Figure 1, Paper III). This agrees well with the description of WAT from transgenic mice exhibit a more BAT-like phenotype, as BAT is significantly more metabolic active and more vascularized than WAT. These observations led us to further study vascular remodeling and maturation. Using an anti-SMA antibody we detected the presence of vascular smooth muscle cells (vSMCs). As expected, vSMCs in the wild-type tissue were localized to the large arterial blood vessels, as the main function of these cells is to support the endothelial cell in the vessel wall (J. E. Hungerford and C. D. Little, 1999). However no vSMCs could be detected in micro vessels (Figure 2, Paper III). Interestingly, both WAT and BAT from FOXC2 transgenic mice contained significantly fewer SMA positive arterial vessels compared with wild-type mice (Figure 2B, Paper III). On the other hand a significant amount of SMA positive cells could be observed with the micro vessels (Figure 2A, Paper III). Using a pericyte specific anti-NG2 antibody we could also detect a similar trend of redistribution of pericytes in microvasculature of WAT and BAT of FOXC2 transgenic mice. Pericytes are mainly found in smaller vessels serving as vessel supporting cells and in wild-type mice were mainly associated with the arterial vessels and broadly distributed in intervascular spaces. However, they were found in a relatively low degree associated with microvessels (Figure 2A, Paper III). In transgenic tissue an altered distribution of NG2 positive pericytes to the microvessels and large arterial vessels could be observed (Figure 2A, Paper III). Quantification revealed a significant increase in the number of vSMCs in FOXC2 transgenic WAT and BAT as compared with wild-type tissue. In contrast, the number of pericytes seemed to be decreased in the transgenic tissue (Figure 2B, Paper III). These findings demonstrate that overexpression of FOXC2 in adipose tissue leads to alterations of both vessel numbers and vascular structure. We would like to speculate that overexpression of FOXC2 affects vessel maturation by regulation of vSMCs and pericyte distribution, in Rickard Westergren 35 order to adapt to the higher metabolic rate seen in adipose tissue of FOXC2 transgenic mice. As previous studies have shown that enhanced FOXC2 expression in adipose tissue is able to affect whole body metabolism we decided to study blood vessel formation in non-adipose tissue. Using the same anti-CD31 antibody as described above we detected vessel organization in dermal and subcutaneous tissues. This revealed a similar phenotype of that of WAT and BAT, including a denser vascular network tissue in FOXC2 transgenic mice as compared with wild-type littermates (Figure 1, supplementary information, Paper III). We also observed the vasculature in tissue from FOXC2 transgenic mice to be more irregular and having significantly shorter inter-capillary distance. As a consequence of the reorganized vessel network a significantly delayed skin wound healing could be observed in FOXC2 transgenic mice compared with wild-type littermates (Figure 5, Paper III). FOXC2 regulates angiogenesis A growing body of evidence shows that the adipocyte is able to cross-communicate with neighboring endothelial cells (L. J. Hutley et al., 2001) (B. Cohen et al., 2001; Y. Cao, 2007). In an attempt to identify the paracrine and endocrine factors produced by FOXC2 transgenic adipocytes we performed Affymetrix microarray and quantitative real time PCR, comparing the expression profiles of abdominal WAT from FOXC2 transgenic and wild-type mice. Expression of several proteins known to affect angiogenesis seemed to be regulated. Among these a number of genes that could contribute to the vascular phenotype seen in adipose tissue of FOXC2 transgenic mice (Figure 3A, Paper III). Ang-2 turned out to be the most regulated gene (almost 6-fold induction). Since Ang-2 is known to regulate vascular pattering, remodeling and maturation (E. Geva et al., 2002; B. Hu et al., 2003) and the fact that several studies have shown Ang-2 to be upregulated in expanding adipose tissue (J. V. Silha et al., 2005; G. Voros et al., 2005) we choose to study this further. Using real time PCR we could demonstrate the expression level of Ang-2 to correlate with the expression of Foxc2 in tissue from Foxc2 +/- mice (Figure 3B, Paper III), a observation that also suggests Foxc2 to be able to regulate Ang-2 expression. Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 36 FOXC2 transcriptionally regulates Ang-2 expression Using the forkhead consensus binding sequence, a sequence analysis of the Ang-2 promoter revealed several putative binding sites for FOXC2. An Ang-2 promoter sequence was fused with a luciferase reporter vector and transfected into 3T3-L1 adipocytes in the presence and absence of FOXC2. A FOXC2 dependent induction of Ang-2 promoter activity could be observed (Figure 3C, Paper III). To further delineate the ability of FOXC2 to be a direct regulator of Ang-2 expression, all of the putative FOXC2 promoter binding sites were individually mutated. Inactivation of a forkhead binding cis-element (Fkh4) almost completely abolished the FOXC2 induced activation of the Ang-2 promoter (Figure 3C, Paper III). The contribution of Fkh1-3 and Fkh5 on the other hand, appeared to be minor. These results strongly support the role of FOXC2 as being a direct regulator of Ang-2 expression. Ang-2 mediates the vascular phenotype of FOXC2 transgenic mice To further study the relation between FOXC2 and Ang-2 we set out to determine whether a known Ang-2-specific inhibitor could affect the angiogenic phenotype seen in FOXC2 transgenic mice. The Ang-2 inhibitor L1-10 was administrated to FOXC2 transgenic mice in a dose known to block Ang-2 function, and were shown to completely reverse the FOXC2 angiogenic phenotype, based on histology of WAT and BAT (Figure 4, Paper III). These observations suggest that the angiogenic effect of FOXC2 is mediated trough activation of Ang-2. Rickard Westergren 37 Conclusions and concluding remarks In paper I, we identify FOXF2 as an adipocyte expressed forkhead gene. We also show that mice overexpressing FOXF2 in adipose tissue have decreased glucose uptake in vivo and display a significantly increased insulin secretion in response to an intravenous glucose load. This is, at least in part, due to an impaired adipocyte insulin signaling associated with decreased levels of Irs1. This is in agreement with the observation that mice deficient in Irs1 expression, display impaired glucose tolerance (H. Abe et al., 1998), and that low levels of IRS1 mRNA and protein in human adipocytes is linked with insulin resistance and T2D (E. Carvalho et al., 2001). Furthermore we show that FOXF2 transgenic adipocytes, similar to adipocytes from Irs1 deficient mice (Y. Kaburagi et al., 1997), exhibit a significantly impaired insulin stimulated glucose uptake as compared with wild-type adipocytes. We also show Foxf2 expression to be induced in WAT following high fat feeding, which suggests involvement in diet-induced insulin resistance. In paper II, we show that mice overexpressing FOXC2 in adipose tissue are protected from diet-induced alterations in liver and skeletal muscle insulin signaling. We furthermore provide evidence that this is associated with decreased levels of intramuscular fatty acid metabolites. Previous studies have pointed out intramuscular accumulation of fatty acid metabolites (e.g. fatty acyl CoA) to cause the development of fat-induced insulin resistance (C. Yu et al., 2002). In the present study we show levels of intramuscular fatty acyl CoA to be significantly increased in wild-type skeletal muscle after 3 weeks on a high-fat diet. In contrast, FOXC2 transgenic mice had more modest levels of intramuscular fatty acyl CoA. We suggest this to be due to increased adipocyte lipid metabolism of the FOXC2 transgenic mice, which prevents lipid accumulation in liver and skeletal muscle. Furthermore, we confirm previous data (A. Cederberg et al., 2001) showing FOXC2 transgenic mice to have significantly reduced whole body fat mass as compared with wild-type littermates, both when fed standard and high-fat diet. Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 38 In paper III, we describe the angiogenic phenotype seen in mice overexpressing FOXC2. This includes a denser and more irregular vascularization in WAT and BAT. Immunohistochemistry examinations reveal an altered distribution of smooth muscle cells and pericytes in adipose tissue from transgenic mice, which indicates effects on vessel remodeling and maturation. We propose this to be, at least in part, due to the higher metabolic rate of transgenic adipocytes (A. Cederberg et al., 2001). In BAT it is well established that increased oxygen consumption and elevated metabolic rate is associated with increased vessel growth and remodeling in response to metabolic needs (A. Asano et al., 1997; C. Tonello et al., 1999). We could further demonstrate regulation of several potent angiogenetic factors, for example Ang-2, in WAT from FOXC2 transgenic mice as compared with wild-type littermates. Since Ang-2 has been shown to be important for regulation of vascular pattering, remodeling and maturation (E. Geva et al., 2002; B. Hu et al., 2003) we investigated this further. Using a luciferase based experimental approach we could point out the capacity of FOXC2 to act as a direct transactivator of the Ang-2 promoter. To further establish the role of FOXC2 as regulator of Ang-2 expression, we could show an almost complete reversal of the FOXC2 transgenic angiogenic phenotype when administrating a known Ang-2 inhibitor. Taken together, our observations indicate that elevated adipocyte metabolic rate seen in mice overexpressing FOXC2, is associated with altered vascularization of adipose tissue and this to be, at least in part, due to transcriptional regulation of Ang-2. Rickard Westergren 39 Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincere gratitude to all who in different ways have helped me during the years working with this thesis. A special thanks goes out to my supervisor Sven Enerbäck, who with his genuine interest in science and never ending enthusiasm always encouraging me in every way both during times of failure and success. And for showing the greatest of empathy when it comes to discussing issues not necessarily involving work. Thank you for providing us in the lab with the tools to create such a pleasant work environment and the ability for us to perform research at the absolute highest level. Hopefully we will continue to collaborate in some way also in the future. Big thanks also to all past and present co-workers in the Enerbäck group. Daniel Nilsson, Mikael Heglind, Martin Lidell, Zahra Arani, Valentina Sukonina, Gunilla Petersson, Matthias Betz, Haixia Ma, Fang Meng, Hilmar Vidarsson, Sandra Rodrigo-Blomqvist, Joakim Håkansson, Anna Cederberg, Mats Grände, Micki Bell and Fredrik Frick. You all provide a fantastic atmosphere in which it is easy to feel welcome. Thank you! Thanks to all co-authors for contributing to this thesis. I would also like to thank "grabbarna grus". Lamm, Lille Per, Bjaren, Långås, DrÄ, Frickoloren, El Grande and Wolfie. When we get together there is always a balanced symbiosis between relevant discussions and irrelevant nonsense, which in my point of view is the perfect mix. How about a retour to the land of Whisky? Thanks to my parents in law, Agneta and Branko, that always help out to make my and Helenas life a little bit easier. I would like to thank my parents, Lena and Håkan, my sister Carolinne with family and my brother Staffan, that always supports me in every way and for showing great interest in my work, even thought I have a hard time explaining what I do. I na kraju ovo najvaznije ja najsrdacnije zahvalujem mojoj zeni Heleni i mojoj kcerki Thei zato sto ste vi najbolja familija sto ja mogu zazeliti. Bez vase pomoci ja nikada nebi mogao zavrsiti ovo doktoriranje i zato sam ja najsretniji sto imam vas dvoje. Ja poklanjam ovu knjigu vama. Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 40 References Abe H, Yamada N, Kamata K, Kuwaki T, Shimada M, Osuga J, Shionoiri F, Yahagi N, Kadowaki T, Tamemoto H, Ishibashi S, Yazaki Y, Makuuchi M (1998) Hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, and impaired endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in mice lacking insulin receptor substrate-1. J Clin Invest 101:1784-1788. Aitola M, Carlsson P, Mahlapuu M, Enerback S, Pelto-Huikko M (2000) Forkhead transcription factor FoxF2 is expressed in mesodermal tissues involved in epithelio-mesenchymal interactions. Dev Dyn 218:136-149. Alessi DR, Andjelkovic M, Caudwell B, Cron P, Morrice N, Cohen P, Hemmings BA (1996) Mechanism of activation of protein kinase B by insulin and IGF-1. EMBO J 15:6541-6551. Araki E, Lipes MA, Patti ME, Bruning JC, Haag B, 3rd, Johnson RS, Kahn CR (1994) Alternative pathway of insulin signalling in mice with targeted disruption of the IRS-1 gene. Nature 372:186-190. Asano A, Morimatsu M, Nikami H, Yoshida T, Saito M (1997) Adrenergic activation of vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA expression in rat brown adipose tissue: implication in cold-induced angiogenesis. Biochem J 328 ( Pt 1):179-183. Barr VA, Malide D, Zarnowski MJ, Taylor SI, Cushman SW (1997) Insulin stimulates both leptin secretion and production by rat white adipose tissue. Endocrinology 138:4463-4472. Barthel A, Schmoll D, Unterman TG (2005) FoxO proteins in insulin action and metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab 16:183-189. Bell R, Brice G, Child AH, Murday VA, Mansour S, Sandy CJ, Collin JR, Brady AF, Callen DF, Burnand K, Mortimer P, Jeffery S (2001) Analysis of lymphoedema-distichiasis families for FOXC2 mutations reveals small insertions and deletions throughout the gene. Hum Genet 108:546-551. Berg AH, Combs TP, Du X, Brownlee M, Scherer PE (2001) The adipocyte-secreted protein Acrp30 enhances hepatic insulin action. Nat Med 7:947-953. Bjorntorp P (1992) Abdominal obesity and the metabolic syndrome. Ann Med 24:465-468. Boden G, Lebed B, Schatz M, Homko C, Lemieux S (2001) Effects of acute changes of plasma free fatty acids on intramyocellular fat content and insulin resistance in healthy subjects. Diabetes 50:1612-1617. Bonnefont JP, Djouadi F, Prip-Buus C, Gobin S, Munnich A, Bastin J (2004) Carnitine palmitoyltransferases 1 and 2: biochemical, molecular and medical aspects. Mol Aspects Med 25:495-520. Boura-Halfon S, Zick Y (2009) Phosphorylation of IRS proteins, insulin action, and insulin resistance. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 296:E581-591. Burri PH, Hlushchuk R, Djonov V (2004) Intussusceptive angiogenesis: its emergence, its characteristics, and its significance. Dev Dyn 231:474-488. Cao Y Adipose tissue angiogenesis as a therapeutic target for obesity and metabolic diseases. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:107-115. Rickard Westergren 41 Cao Y (2007) Angiogenesis modulates adipogenesis and obesity. J Clin Invest 117:2362-2368. Carlsson P, Mahlapuu M (2002) Forkhead transcription factors: key players in development and metabolism. Dev Biol 250:1-23. Carvalho E, Jansson PA, Nagaev I, Wenthzel AM, Smith U (2001) Insulin resistance with low cellular IRS-1 expression is also associated with low GLUT4 expression and impaired insulin-stimulated glucose transport. FASEB J 15:1101-1103. Cederberg A, Gronning LM, Ahren B, Tasken K, Carlsson P, Enerback S (2001) FOXC2 is a winged helix gene that counteracts obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, and diet-induced insulin resistance. Cell 106:563-573. Chen L (1999) Combinatorial gene regulation by eukaryotic transcription factors. Curr Opin Struct Biol 9:48-55. Clausen JO, Hansen T, Bjorbaek C, Echwald SM, Urhammer SA, Rasmussen S, Andersen CB, Hansen L, Almind K, Winther K, et al. (1995) Insulin resistance: interactions between obesity and a common variant of insulin receptor substrate-1. Lancet 346:397-402. Coe NR, Simpson MA, Bernlohr DA (1999) Targeted disruption of the adipocyte lipid-binding protein (aP2 protein) gene impairs fat cell lipolysis and increases cellular fatty acid levels. J Lipid Res 40:967-972. Coffer PJ, Burgering BM (2004) Forkhead-box transcription factors and their role in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 4:889-899. Cohen B, Barkan D, Levy Y, Goldberg I, Fridman E, Kopolovic J, Rubinstein M (2001) Leptin induces angiopoietin-2 expression in adipose tissues. J Biol Chem 276:7697-7700. Consitt LA, Bell JA, Houmard JA (2009) Intramuscular lipid metabolism, insulin action, and obesity. IUBMB Life 61:47-55. Dagenais SL, Hartsough RL, Erickson RP, Witte MH, Butler MG, Glover TW (2004) Foxc2 is expressed in developing lymphatic vessels and other tissues associated with lymphedema-distichiasis syndrome. Gene Expr Patterns 4:611-619. Davis S, Aldrich TH, Jones PF, Acheson A, Compton DL, Jain V, Ryan TE, Bruno J, Radziejewski C, Maisonpierre PC, Yancopoulos GD (1996) Isolation of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, by secretion-trap expression cloning. Cell 87:1161-1169. De Fea K, Roth RA (1997) Protein kinase C modulation of insulin receptor substrate-1 tyrosine phosphorylation requires serine 612. Biochemistry 36:12939-12947. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R (1979) Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol 237:E214-223. Draznin B (2006) Molecular mechanisms of insulin resistance: serine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate-1 and increased expression of p85alpha: the two sides of a coin. Diabetes 55:2392-2397. Fang J, Dagenais SL, Erickson RP, Arlt MF, Glynn MW, Gorski JL, Seaver LH, Glover TW (2000) Mutations in FOXC2 (MFH-1), a forkhead family transcription factor, are responsible for the hereditary lymphedema-distichiasis syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 67:1382-1388. Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 42 Frankel AD, Kim PS (1991) Modular structure of transcription factors: implications for gene regulation. Cell 65:717-719. Gerin I, Bommer GT, Lidell ME, Cederberg A, Enerback S, Macdougald OA (2009) On the role of FOX transcription factors in adipocyte differentiation and insulin-stimulated glucose uptake. J Biol Chem 284:10755-10763. Geva E, Ginzinger DG, Zaloudek CJ, Moore DH, Byrne A, Jaffe RB (2002) Human placental vascular development: vasculogenic and angiogenic (branching and nonbranching) transformation is regulated by vascular endothelial growth factor-A, angiopoietin-1, and angiopoietin-2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:4213-4224. Gilbert SF, Singer SR, Tyler MS, Kozlowski RN (2006) Developmental biology, 8th Edition. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers. Gray PA et al. (2004) Mouse brain organization revealed through direct genome-scale TF expression analysis. Science 306:2255-2257. Griffin ME, Marcucci MJ, Cline GW, Bell K, Barucci N, Lee D, Goodyear LJ, Kraegen EW, White MF, Shulman GI (1999) Free fatty acid-induced insulin resistance is associated with activation of protein kinase C theta and alterations in the insulin signaling cascade. Diabetes 48:1270-1274. Gual P, Le Marchand-Brustel Y, Tanti J (2003) Positive and negative regulation of glucose uptake by hyperosmotic stress. Diabetes Metab 29:566-575. Hajri T, Han XX, Bonen A, Abumrad NA (2002) Defective fatty acid uptake modulates insulin responsiveness and metabolic responses to diet in CD36-null mice. J Clin Invest 109:1381-1389. Hanahan D (1997) Signaling vascular morphogenesis and maintenance. Science 277:48-50. Hannenhalli S, Kaestner KH (2009) The evolution of Fox genes and their role in development and disease. Nat Rev Genet 10:233-240. Hausman GJ, Richardson RL (2004) Adipose tissue angiogenesis. J Anim Sci 82:925-934. Hayashi H, Kume T (2008) Forkhead transcription factors regulate expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in endothelial cells and CXCL12-induced cell migration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 367:584-589. Hayashi H, Sano H, Seo S, Kume T (2008) The Foxc2 transcription factor regulates angiogenesis via induction of integrin beta 3 expression. J Biol Chem. Hellqvist M, Mahlapuu M, Samuelsson L, Enerback S, Carlsson P (1996) Differential activation of lung-specific genes by two forkhead proteins, FREAC-1 and FREAC-2. J Biol Chem 271:4482-4490. Hirosumi J, Tuncman G, Chang L, Gorgun CZ, Uysal KT, Maeda K, Karin M, Hotamisligil GS (2002) A central role for JNK in obesity and insulin resistance. Nature 420:333-336. Hitman GA, Hawrami K, McCarthy MI, Viswanathan M, Snehalatha C, Ramachandran A, Tuomilehto J, Tuomilehto-Wolf E, Nissinen A, Pedersen O (1995) Insulin receptor substrate-1 gene mutations in NIDDM; implications for the study of polygenic disease. Diabetologia 38:481-486. Rickard Westergren 43 Holash J, Maisonpierre PC, Compton D, Boland P, Alexander CR, Zagzag D, Yancopoulos GD, Wiegand SJ (1999) Vessel cooption, regression, and growth in tumors mediated by angiopoietins and VEGF. Science 284:1994-1998. Hosaka T, Biggs WH, 3rd, Tieu D, Boyer AD, Varki NM, Cavenee WK, Arden KC (2004) Disruption of forkhead transcription factor (FOXO) family members in mice reveals their functional diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:2975-2980. Hotamisligil GS, Shargill NS, Spiegelman BM (1993) Adipose expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha: direct role in obesity-linked insulin resistance. Science 259:87-91. Hotamisligil GS, Peraldi P, Budavari A, Ellis R, White MF, Spiegelman BM (1996) IRS-1-mediated inhibition of insulin receptor tyrosine kinase activity in TNF-alpha- and obesity-induced insulin resistance. Science 271:665-668. Hribal ML, Federici M, Porzio O, Lauro D, Borboni P, Accili D, Lauro R, Sesti G (2000) The Gly-->Arg972 amino acid polymorphism in insulin receptor substrate-1 affects glucose metabolism in skeletal muscle cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:2004-2013. Hu B, Guo P, Fang Q, Tao HQ, Wang D, Nagane M, Huang HJ, Gunji Y, Nishikawa R, Alitalo K, Cavenee WK, Cheng SY (2003) Angiopoietin-2 induces human glioma invasion through the activation of matrix metalloprotease-2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8904-8909. Hu E, Liang P, Spiegelman BM (1996) AdipoQ is a novel adipose-specific gene dysregulated in obesity. J Biol Chem 271:10697-10703. Hungerford JE, Little CD (1999) Developmental biology of the vascular smooth muscle cell: building a multilayered vessel wall. J Vasc Res 36:2-27. Hutley LJ, Herington AC, Shurety W, Cheung C, Vesey DA, Cameron DP, Prins JB (2001) Human adipose tissue endothelial cells promote preadipocyte proliferation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 281:E1037-1044. Iida K, Koseki H, Kakinuma H, Kato N, Mizutani-Koseki Y, Ohuchi H, Yoshioka H, Noji S, Kawamura K, Kataoka Y, Ueno F, Taniguchi M, Yoshida N, Sugiyama T, Miura N (1997) Essential roles of the winged helix transcription factor MFH-1 in aortic arch patterning and skeletogenesis. Development 124:4627-4638. Itani SI, Zhou Q, Pories WJ, MacDonald KG, Dohm GL (2000) Involvement of protein kinase C in human skeletal muscle insulin resistance and obesity. Diabetes 49:1353-1358. Itoh Y et al. (2003) Free fatty acids regulate insulin secretion from pancreatic beta cells through GPR40. Nature 422:173-176. Jackson D, Volpert OV, Bouck N, Linzer DI (1994) Stimulation and inhibition of angiogenesis by placental proliferin and proliferin-related protein. Science 266:1581-1584. James DE, Brown R, Navarro J, Pilch PF (1988) Insulin-regulatable tissues express a unique insulin-sensitive glucose transport protein. Nature 333:183-185. Jin SW, Patterson C (2009) The opening act: vasculogenesis and the origins of circulation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 29:623-629. Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 44 Johnson SM, Kincannon JM, Horn TD (1999) Lymphedema-distichiasis syndrome: report of a case and review. Arch Dermatol 135:347-348. Jones N, Iljin K, Dumont DJ, Alitalo K (2001) Tie receptors: new modulators of angiogenic and lymphangiogenic responses. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:257-267. Jonsson H, Peng SL (2005) Forkhead transcription factors in immunology. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:397-409. Kaburagi Y, Satoh S, Tamemoto H, Yamamoto-Honda R, Tobe K, Veki K, Yamauchi T, Kono-Sugita E, Sekihara H, Aizawa S, Cushman SW, Akanuma Y, Yazaki Y, Kadowaki T (1997) Role of insulin receptor substrate-1 and pp60 in the regulation of insulin-induced glucose transport and GLUT4 translocation in primary adipocytes. J Biol Chem 272:25839-25844. Kaestner KH, Knochel W, Martinez DE (2000) Unified nomenclature for the winged helix/forkhead transcription factors. Genes Dev 14:142-146. Kaestner KH, Lee KH, Schlondorff J, Hiemisch H, Monaghan AP, Schutz G (1993) Six members of the mouse forkhead gene family are developmentally regulated. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 90:7628-7631. Kim HJ, Higashimori T, Park SY, Choi H, Dong J, Kim YJ, Noh HL, Cho YR, Cline G, Kim YB, Kim JK (2004) Differential effects of interleukin-6 and -10 on skeletal muscle and liver insulin action in vivo. Diabetes 53:1060-1067. Kim JK, Fillmore JJ, Chen Y, Yu C, Moore IK, Pypaert M, Lutz EP, Kako Y, Velez-Carrasco W, Goldberg IJ, Breslow JL, Shulman GI (2001) Tissue-specific overexpression of lipoprotein lipase causes tissue-specific insulin resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:7522-7527. Kim JK, Fillmore JJ, Gavrilova O, Chao L, Higashimori T, Choi H, Kim HJ, Yu C, Chen Y, Qu X, Haluzik M, Reitman ML, Shulman GI (2003) Differential effects of rosiglitazone on skeletal muscle and liver insulin resistance in A-ZIP/F-1 fatless mice. Diabetes 52:1311-1318. Kim JK, Kim HJ, Park SY, Cederberg A, Westergren R, Nilsson D, Higashimori T, Cho YR, Liu ZX, Dong J, Cline GW, Enerback S, Shulman GI (2005) Adipocyte-specific overexpression of FOXC2 prevents diet-induced increases in intramuscular fatty acyl CoA and insulin resistance. Diabetes 54:1657-1663. Kim JK, Gimeno RE, Higashimori T, Kim HJ, Choi H, Punreddy S, Mozell RL, Tan G, Stricker-Krongrad A, Hirsch DJ, Fillmore JJ, Liu ZX, Dong J, Cline G, Stahl A, Lodish HF, Shulman GI (2004) Inactivation of fatty acid transport protein 1 prevents fat-induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle. J Clin Invest 113:756-763. Klaman LD, Boss O, Peroni OD, Kim JK, Martino JL, Zabolotny JM, Moghal N, Lubkin M, Kim YB, Sharpe AH, Stricker-Krongrad A, Shulman GI, Neel BG, Kahn BB (2000) Increased energy expenditure, decreased adiposity, and tissue-specific insulin sensitivity in protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B-deficient mice. Mol Cell Biol 20:5479-5489. Korbonits M, S. Karger (Firm) (2008) Obesity and metabolism. In: Frontiers of hormone research, v. 36, pp vi, 294 p. Basel ; New York: Karger. Rickard Westergren 45 Korver W, Roose J, Heinen K, Weghuis DO, de Bruijn D, van Kessel AG, Clevers H (1997) The human TRIDENT/HFH-11/FKHL16 gene: structure, localization, and promoter characterization. Genomics 46:435-442. Kraegen EW, Cooney GJ, Ye J, Thompson AL (2001) Triglycerides, fatty acids and insulin resistance--hyperinsulinemia. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 109:S516-526. Kriederman BM, Myloyde TL, Witte MH, Dagenais SL, Witte CL, Rennels M, Bernas MJ, Lynch MT, Erickson RP, Caulder MS, Miura N, Jackson D, Brooks BP, Glover TW (2003) FOXC2 haploinsufficient mice are a model for human autosomal dominant lymphedema-distichiasis syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 12:1179-1185. Krssak M, Falk Petersen K, Dresner A, DiPietro L, Vogel SM, Rothman DL, Roden M, Shulman GI (1999) Intramyocellular lipid concentrations are correlated with insulin sensitivity in humans: a 1H NMR spectroscopy study. Diabetologia 42:113-116. Latchman DS (1997) Transcription factors: an overview. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 29:1305-1312. Liekens S, De Clercq E, Neyts J (2001) Angiogenesis: regulators and clinical applications. Biochem Pharmacol 61:253-270. Lodish HF, Darnell JE (2000) Molecular cell biology, 4th Edition. New York: W.H. Freeman. Maisonpierre PC, Suri C, Jones PF, Bartunkova S, Wiegand SJ, Radziejewski C, Compton D, McClain J, Aldrich TH, Papadopoulos N, Daly TJ, Davis S, Sato TN, Yancopoulos GD (1997) Angiopoietin-2, a natural antagonist for Tie2 that disrupts in vivo angiogenesis. Science 277:55-60. Makanya AN, Hlushchuk R, Djonov VG (2009) Intussusceptive angiogenesis and its role in vascular morphogenesis, patterning, and remodeling. Angiogenesis 12:113-123. Medema RH, Kops GJ, Bos JL, Burgering BM (2000) AFX-like Forkhead transcription factors mediate cell-cycle regulation by Ras and PKB through p27kip1. Nature 404:782-787. Menzaghi C, Ercolino T, Di Paola R, Berg AH, Warram JH, Scherer PE, Trischitta V, Doria A (2002) A haplotype at the adiponectin locus is associated with obesity and other features of the insulin resistance syndrome. Diabetes 51:2306-2312. Miura N, Wanaka A, Tohyama M, Tanaka K (1993) MFH-1, a new member of the fork head domain family, is expressed in developing mesenchyme. FEBS Lett 326:171-176. Nakae J, Cao Y, Oki M, Orba Y, Sawa H, Kiyonari H, Iskandar K, Suga K, Lombes M, Hayashi Y (2008) Forkhead transcription factor FoxO1 in adipose tissue regulates energy storage and expenditure. Diabetes 57:563-576. Neufeld G, Cohen T, Gengrinovitch S, Poltorak Z (1999) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptors. FASEB J 13:9-22. O'Reilly MS, Holmgren L, Shing Y, Chen C, Rosenthal RA, Moses M, Lane WS, Cao Y, Sage EH, Folkman J (1994) Angiostatin: a novel angiogenesis inhibitor that mediates the suppression of metastases by a Lewis lung carcinoma. Cell 79:315-328. Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 46 O'Reilly MS, Boehm T, Shing Y, Fukai N, Vasios G, Lane WS, Flynn E, Birkhead JR, Olsen BR, Folkman J (1997) Endostatin: an endogenous inhibitor of angiogenesis and tumor growth. Cell 88:277-285. Oh H, Takagi H, Suzuma K, Otani A, Matsumura M, Honda Y (1999) Hypoxia and vascular endothelial growth factor selectively up-regulate angiopoietin-2 in bovine microvascular endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 274:15732-15739. Oliner J et al. (2004) Suppression of angiogenesis and tumor growth by selective inhibition of angiopoietin-2. Cancer Cell 6:507-516. Ormestad M, Astorga J, Landgren H, Wang T, Johansson BR, Miura N, Carlsson P (2006) Foxf1 and Foxf2 control murine gut development by limiting mesenchymal Wnt signaling and promoting extracellular matrix production. Development 133:833-843. Osborne TF (2000) Sterol regulatory element-binding proteins (SREBPs): key regulators of nutritional homeostasis and insulin action. J Biol Chem 275:32379-32382. Papanicolaou KN, Izumiya Y, Walsh K (2008) Forkhead transcription factors and cardiovascular biology. Circ Res 102:16-31. Papetti M, Herman IM (2002) Mechanisms of normal and tumor-derived angiogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282:C947-970. Paz K, Hemi R, LeRoith D, Karasik A, Elhanany E, Kanety H, Zick Y (1997) A molecular basis for insulin resistance. Elevated serine/threonine phosphorylation of IRS-1 and IRS-2 inhibits their binding to the juxtamembrane region of the insulin receptor and impairs their ability to undergo insulin-induced tyrosine phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 272:29911-29918. Petersen KF, Oral EA, Dufour S, Befroy D, Ariyan C, Yu C, Cline GW, DePaoli AM, Taylor SI, Gorden P, Shulman GI (2002) Leptin reverses insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis in patients with severe lipodystrophy. J Clin Invest 109:1345-1350. Petrova TV, Karpanen T, Norrmen C, Mellor R, Tamakoshi T, Finegold D, Ferrell R, Kerjaschki D, Mortimer P, Yla-Herttuala S, Miura N, Alitalo K (2004) Defective valves and abnormal mural cell recruitment underlie lymphatic vascular failure in lymphedema distichiasis. Nat Med 10:974-981. Philip-Couderc P, Tavares NI, Roatti A, Lerch R, Montessuit C, Baertschi AJ (2008) Forkhead transcription factors coordinate expression of myocardial KATP channel subunits and energy metabolism. Circ Res 102:e20-35. Pichiule P, Chavez JC, LaManna JC (2004) Hypoxic regulation of angiopoietin-2 expression in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 279:12171-12180. Pierrou S, Hellqvist M, Samuelsson L, Enerback S, Carlsson P (1994) Cloning and characterization of seven human forkhead proteins: binding site specificity and DNA bending. EMBO J 13:5002-5012. Pirola L, Johnston AM, Van Obberghen E (2004) Modulation of insulin action. Diabetologia 47:170-184. Potente M, Urbich C, Sasaki K, Hofmann WK, Heeschen C, Aicher A, Kollipara R, DePinho RA, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S (2005) Involvement of Foxo transcription Rickard Westergren 47 factors in angiogenesis and postnatal neovascularization. J Clin Invest 115:2382-2392. Randle PJ, Garland PB, Hales CN, Newsholme EA (1963) The glucose fatty-acid cycle. Its role in insulin sensitivity and the metabolic disturbances of diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1:785-789. Reaven GM (1988) Banting lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 37:1595-1607. Reaven GM (2005) The metabolic syndrome: requiescat in pace. Clin Chem 51:931-938. Reiss Y, Droste J, Heil M, Tribulova S, Schmidt MH, Schaper W, Dumont DJ, Plate KH (2007) Angiopoietin-2 impairs revascularization after limb ischemia. Circ Res 101:88-96. Ribatti D, Vacca A, Nico B, Roncali L, Dammacco F (2001) Postnatal vasculogenesis. Mech Dev 100:157-163. Ross SR, Graves RA, Greenstein A, Platt KA, Shyu HL, Mellovitz B, Spiegelman BM (1990) A fat-specific enhancer is the primary determinant of gene expression for adipocyte P2 in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:9590-9594. Rotter V, Nagaev I, Smith U (2003) Interleukin-6 (IL-6) induces insulin resistance in 3T3-L1 adipocytes and is, like IL-8 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha, overexpressed in human fat cells from insulin-resistant subjects. J Biol Chem 278:45777-45784. Rui L, Aguirre V, Kim JK, Shulman GI, Lee A, Corbould A, Dunaif A, White MF (2001) Insulin/IGF-1 and TNF-alpha stimulate phosphorylation of IRS-1 at inhibitory Ser307 via distinct pathways. J Clin Invest 107:181-189. Saad MF, Knowler WC, Pettitt DJ, Nelson RG, Charles MA, Bennett PH (1991) A two-step model for development of non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Am J Med 90:229-235. Saad MJ, Araki E, Miralpeix M, Rothenberg PL, White MF, Kahn CR (1992) Regulation of insulin receptor substrate-1 in liver and muscle of animal models of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 90:1839-1849. Saha PK, Kojima H, Martinez-Botas J, Sunehag AL, Chan L (2004) Metabolic adaptations in the absence of perilipin: increased beta-oxidation and decreased hepatic glucose production associated with peripheral insulin resistance but normal glucose tolerance in perilipin-null mice. J Biol Chem 279:35150-35158. Saltiel AR, Kahn CR (2001) Insulin signalling and the regulation of glucose and lipid metabolism. Nature 414:799-806. Sarbassov DD, Guertin DA, Ali SM, Sabatini DM (2005) Phosphorylation and regulation of Akt/PKB by the rictor-mTOR complex. Science 307:1098-1101. Seidell JC (2000) Obesity, insulin resistance and diabetes--a worldwide epidemic. Br J Nutr 83 Suppl 1:S5-8. Seo S, Fujita H, Nakano A, Kang M, Duarte A, Kume T (2006) The forkhead transcription factors, Foxc1 and Foxc2, are required for arterial specification and lymphatic sprouting during vascular development. Dev Biol 294:458-470. Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 48 Shih DQ, Navas MA, Kuwajima S, Duncan SA, Stoffel M (1999) Impaired glucose homeostasis and neonatal mortality in hepatocyte nuclear factor 3alpha-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:10152-10157. Shirakami A, Toyonaga T, Tsuruzoe K, Shirotani T, Matsumoto K, Yoshizato K, Kawashima J, Hirashima Y, Miyamura N, Kahn CR, Araki E (2002) Heterozygous knockout of the IRS-1 gene in mice enhances obesity-linked insulin resistance: a possible model for the development of type 2 diabetes. J Endocrinol 174:309-319. Shulman GI (2000) Cellular mechanisms of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest 106:171-176. Silha JV, Krsek M, Sucharda P, Murphy LJ (2005) Angiogenic factors are elevated in overweight and obese individuals. Int J Obes (Lond) 29:1308-1314. Smith RS, Zabaleta A, Kume T, Savinova OV, Kidson SH, Martin JE, Nishimura DY, Alward WL, Hogan BL, John SW (2000) Haploinsufficiency of the transcription factors FOXC1 and FOXC2 results in aberrant ocular development. Hum Mol Genet 9:1021-1032. Spiegelman BM, Flier JS (1996) Adipogenesis and obesity: rounding out the big picture. Cell 87:377-389. Stenbit AE, Tsao TS, Li J, Burcelin R, Geenen DL, Factor SM, Houseknecht K, Katz EB, Charron MJ (1997) GLUT4 heterozygous knockout mice develop muscle insulin resistance and diabetes. Nat Med 3:1096-1101. Steppan CM, Bailey ST, Bhat S, Brown EJ, Banerjee RR, Wright CM, Patel HR, Ahima RS, Lazar MA (2001) The hormone resistin links obesity to diabetes. Nature 409:307-312. Suri C, Jones PF, Patan S, Bartunkova S, Maisonpierre PC, Davis S, Sato TN, Yancopoulos GD (1996) Requisite role of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, during embryonic angiogenesis. Cell 87:1171-1180. Tamemoto H, Kadowaki T, Tobe K, Yagi T, Sakura H, Hayakawa T, Terauchi Y, Ueki K, Kaburagi Y, Satoh S, et al. (1994) Insulin resistance and growth retardation in mice lacking insulin receptor substrate-1. Nature 372:182-186. Tang W, Zeve D, Suh JM, Bosnakovski D, Kyba M, Hammer RE, Tallquist MD, Graff JM (2008) White fat progenitor cells reside in the adipose vasculature. Science 322:583-586. Taniguchi CM, Emanuelli B, Kahn CR (2006) Critical nodes in signalling pathways: insights into insulin action. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7:85-96. Tansey JT, Sztalryd C, Gruia-Gray J, Roush DL, Zee JV, Gavrilova O, Reitman ML, Deng CX, Li C, Kimmel AR, Londos C (2001) Perilipin ablation results in a lean mouse with aberrant adipocyte lipolysis, enhanced leptin production, and resistance to diet-induced obesity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:6494-6499. Tanti JF, Gremeaux T, van Obberghen E, Le Marchand-Brustel Y (1994) Serine/threonine phosphorylation of insulin receptor substrate 1 modulates insulin receptor signaling. J Biol Chem 269:6051-6057. Thiebaud D, Jacot E, DeFronzo RA, Maeder E, Jequier E, Felber JP (1982) The effect of graded doses of insulin on total glucose uptake, glucose oxidation, and glucose storage in man. Diabetes 31:957-963. Rickard Westergren 49 Thurston G (2003) Role of Angiopoietins and Tie receptor tyrosine kinases in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Cell Tissue Res 314:61-68. Tonello C, Giordano A, Cozzi V, Cinti S, Stock MJ, Carruba MO, Nisoli E (1999) Role of sympathetic activity in controlling the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in brown fat cells of lean and genetically obese rats. FEBS Lett 442:167-172. Uysal KT, Wiesbrock SM, Marino MW, Hotamisligil GS (1997) Protection from obesity-induced insulin resistance in mice lacking TNF-alpha function. Nature 389:610-614. Valenzuela DM, Griffiths JA, Rojas J, Aldrich TH, Jones PF, Zhou H, McClain J, Copeland NG, Gilbert DJ, Jenkins NA, Huang T, Papadopoulos N, Maisonpierre PC, Davis S, Yancopoulos GD (1999) Angiopoietins 3 and 4: diverging gene counterparts in mice and humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:1904-1909. van der Heul-Nieuwenhuijsen L, Dits NF, Jenster G (2009) Gene expression of forkhead transcription factors in the normal and diseased human prostate. BJU Int 103:1574-1580. Voros G, Maquoi E, Demeulemeester D, Clerx N, Collen D, Lijnen HR (2005) Modulation of angiogenesis during adipose tissue development in murine models of obesity. Endocrinology 146:4545-4554. Wang T, Tamakoshi T, Uezato T, Shu F, Kanzaki-Kato N, Fu Y, Koseki H, Yoshida N, Sugiyama T, Miura N (2003) Forkhead transcription factor Foxf2 (LUN)-deficient mice exhibit abnormal development of secondary palate. Dev Biol 259:83-94. Wang Z, Banerjee S, Kong D, Li Y, Sarkar FH (2007) Down-regulation of Forkhead Box M1 transcription factor leads to the inhibition of invasion and angiogenesis of pancreatic cancer cells. Cancer Res 67:8293-8300. Wellen KE, Hotamisligil GS (2005) Inflammation, stress, and diabetes. J Clin Invest 115:1111-1119. White MF (1997) The insulin signalling system and the IRS proteins. Diabetologia 40 Suppl 2:S2-17. Whiteman EL, Cho H, Birnbaum MJ (2002) Role of Akt/protein kinase B in metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab 13:444-451. Wijchers PJ, Burbach JP, Smidt MP (2006) In control of biology: of mice, men and Foxes. Biochem J 397:233-246. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H (2004) Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 27:1047-1053. Winnier GE, Hargett L, Hogan BL (1997) The winged helix transcription factor MFH1 is required for proliferation and patterning of paraxial mesoderm in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev 11:926-940. Winnier GE, Kume T, Deng K, Rogers R, Bundy J, Raines C, Walter MA, Hogan BL, Conway SJ (1999) Roles for the winged helix transcription factors MF1 and MFH1 in cardiovascular development revealed by nonallelic noncomplementation of null alleles. Dev Biol 213:418-431. Wolfrum C, Shih DQ, Kuwajima S, Norris AW, Kahn CR, Stoffel M (2003) Role of Foxa-2 in adipocyte metabolism and differentiation. J Clin Invest 112:345-356. Foxf2 and Foxc2, two transcription factors that regulate metabolism 50 Xue Y, Petrovic N, Cao R, Larsson O, Lim S, Chen S, Feldmann HM, Liang Z, Zhu Z, Nedergaard J, Cannon B, Cao Y (2009) Hypoxia-independent angiogenesis in adipose tissues during cold acclimation. Cell Metab 9:99-109. Yamauchi T et al. (2001) The fat-derived hormone adiponectin reverses insulin resistance associated with both lipoatrophy and obesity. Nat Med 7:941-946. Yancopoulos GD, Davis S, Gale NW, Rudge JS, Wiegand SJ, Holash J (2000) Vascular-specific growth factors and blood vessel formation. Nature 407:242-248. Yildirim-Toruner C, Subramanian K, El Manjra L, Chen E, Goldstein S, Vitale E (2004) A novel frameshift mutation of FOXC2 gene in a family with hereditary lymphedema-distichiasis syndrome associated with renal disease and diabetes mellitus. Am J Med Genet A 131:281-286. Yu C, Chen Y, Cline GW, Zhang D, Zong H, Wang Y, Bergeron R, Kim JK, Cushman SW, Cooney GJ, Atcheson B, White MF, Kraegen EW, Shulman GI (2002) Mechanism by which fatty acids inhibit insulin activation of insulin receptor substrate-1 (IRS-1)-associated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activity in muscle. J Biol Chem 277:50230-50236. Yuan M, Konstantopoulos N, Lee J, Hansen L, Li ZW, Karin M, Shoelson SE (2001) Reversal of obesity- and diet-induced insulin resistance with salicylates or targeted disruption of Ikkbeta. Science 293:1673-1677. Zhang L, Yang N, Park JW, Katsaros D, Fracchioli S, Cao G, O'Brien-Jenkins A, Randall TC, Rubin SC, Coukos G (2003) Tumor-derived vascular endothelial growth factor up-regulates angiopoietin-2 in host endothelium and destabilizes host vasculature, supporting angiogenesis in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res 63:3403-3412. Zick Y (2005) Ser/Thr phosphorylation of IRS proteins: a molecular basis for insulin resistance. Sci STKE 2005:pe4.