2026-09-21T22:40:53Zhttps://gupea.ub.gu.se/server/oai/request

oai:gupea.ub.gu.se:2077/536752026-07-14T09:07:30Zcom_2077_22406com_2077_7610com_2077_10556com_2077_4560col_2077_22410col_2077_10557col_2077_4568

Borgfeldt, Eva 2017-11-05T18:17:02Z 2017-11-05T18:17:02Z 2017-11-05 978-91-7346-937-1 (print) 978-91-7346-938-8 (pdf) 0346-7740 0436-1121 http://hdl.handle.net/2077/53675 Drawing and coloring have been part of young students text making as long as the writing system has been used, but with the increased use of digital tools and an enlarged focus on accountability of today there is a reinforced educational interest to understand what constitutes multimodal student texts in the context of classroom practice. This thesis project overall aim is to highlight and discuss the opportunities and difficulties in the assessment of language and knowledge-developing multimodal text work in a multilingual educational context. Conceptually the study is grounded in sociocultural theories, in sociosemiotic theory and in multiliteracies research. The methods used consist of qualitative multimodal text analysis and semi-structured interviews with students and their teacher. The three empirical studies were carried out, each having a different perspective. The first study looks at the text production of students in an integrated work of drawing, coloring and writing. The second study focuses how students reason when they choose to draw, write or both draw and write when they report to their teacher what they have learned. The third study discusses what the teacher highlights when assessing her students’ multimodal text productions. Overall, the results show that the semiotic resources, images and color, dominate students’ text productions and that the teacher attaches great importance to the illustrations, but that she, despite the best intentions, has trouble using multimodal criteria when assessing the students’ different ways of expressions and semiotic resources into a whole. It seems to be problematic for the teacher to allow students to freely interpret and independently design the task while she at the same time intends to make an overall assessment of how the content is presented. The results also indicate that it is difficult for the students to verbalize their thoughts on the assessment and in practice; the teacher more often is focused on assessing abilities relating to how thoroughly the students carry out the process of documenting rather than encouraging the students to develop and express their knowledge. Finally, the thesis concludes with discussing the content of an ongoing need for research, especially regarding the consequences it may have for younger students, whatever language background they have. swe Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis Gothenburg Studies in Educational Sciences ; 407 Borgfeldt, E., & Lyngfelt, A. (2014). Elevtexter som sociosemiotiska uttryck. En studie av elevrespons och sociosemiotisk positionering i årskurs 3. I P. Andersson, P. Holmberg, A. Lyngfelt, A. Nordenstam, & O. Widhe (Red.), Mångfaldens möjligheter. Litteratur- och språkdidaktik i Norden (s. 131-153). Göteborg: Nationella nätverket för svenska med didaktisk inriktning. https://www5.kau.se/sites/default/files/Dokument/subpage/2014/12/m_n gfaldens_m_jligheter_20141123_pdf_57141.pdf Borgfeldt, E., & Lyngfelt, A. (2017). ”Jag ritade först sen skrev jag”. Elevperspektiv på multimodal textproduktion i årskurs 3. Forskning om undervisning och lärande 2017: 1 vol. 5, s. 64-88. http://www.forskul.se/tidskrift/nummer18/jag_ritade_forst_sen_skrev_jag_ __elevperspektiv_pa_multimodal_textproduktion_i_arskurs_3 Borgfeldt, E. (2017). Multimodal textproduktion i årskurs 3 – analys av en lärares bedömning. Educare: 2017: 1, s. 118-151. Malmö: Lärande och samhälle, Malmö högskola. https://www.mah.se/upload/FAKULTETER/LS/Dokument%20LS/Educa re%2017.1%20muep.pdf multimodality semiotic resources meaning making literacy assessment multilingualism ”Det kan vara svårt att förklara på rader”. Perspektiv på analys och bedömning av multimodal textproduktion i årskurs 3. Text Doctoral thesis Doctor of Philosophy eva.borgfeldt@hkr.se Göteborgs universitet. Utbildningsvetenskapliga fakulteten University of Gothenburg. Faculty of Education Department of Pedagogical, Curricular and Professional Studies ; Institutionen för didaktik och pedagogisk profession Fredagen den 24 november 2017, kl. 13.00 Göteborgs universitet, Pedagogen, Hus B, sal BE 036 2017-11-24 UF open.access