Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrölander, Freja
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-08T14:49:41Z
dc.date.available2016-06-08T14:49:41Z
dc.date.issued2016-06-08
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/44460
dc.descriptionUppsats för avläggande av filosofie kandidatexamen i Kulturvård, Trädgårdens och landskapsvårdens hantverk, 15 hp, 2016sv
dc.description.abstractIn projects to sustainably develop the countryside by mapping ecosystem services, integration of ’local knowledge systems’ is often an important part. However, there are indicators pointing towards a tendency that local knowledge often is diminished, and is not valued as high as ’formal knowledge’ derived from science and institutions. This threatens the possibility of obtaining sustainable development as well as the conservation of local knowledge systems transferred over generations. To determine the differences between the formal and local knowledge systems, a comparison was made by mapping historical land-use patterns by using historical maps between 1718 and 1890’s. The produced maps were compared to present-day maps to locate areas with long continuity in land-use as potential locations for biodiversity remnants. The maps were used to formulate questions asked to local farmers during a semi structured interview. By applying a norm-critical view, the formal and local knowledge systems were compared. There was an expectation that the result from the interviews would fit in to the result derived from the mapping due to similarities in perception of value. It did not. The farmers did not perceive nature- and cultural heritage landscape values as separated, something the formal knowledge system just have begun to recognize. Instead, value was perceived in the different actions to keep or increase the production value on their estates. The interest in developing ecosystem services on one’s land differed between the farmers, however all of them agreed that to achieve sustainable development, the financial prerequisites for farmers have to be met by other means than submissions. The study shows the necessity for increments of different perspectives if the goal is a sustainable development of the countryside and that a norm-critical perspective may be an aid in future studies and projects.sv
dc.language.isoswesv
dc.subjectCultural ecosystem servicessv
dc.subjectKnowledge systemssv
dc.subjectSustainable developmentsv
dc.subjectCultural landscapesv
dc.subjectKulturlandskapsv
dc.subjectLandsbygdsutvecklingsv
dc.subjectKunskapssystemsv
dc.subjectLandskapsvårdsv
dc.subjectEkosystemtjänstersv
dc.titleFormella och lokala kunskapssystem. En studie utifrån den kulturella ekosystemtjänsten kunskapssystem i socknarna Erska och Stora Mellby, Alingsås kommunsv
dc.title.alternativeFormal and local knowledge systems: Differences in Cultural Landscape Perception in Erska and Stora Mellby Parishessv
dc.typeText
dc.setspec.uppsokPhysicsChemistryMaths
dc.type.uppsokM2
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Gothenburg/Department of Conservationeng
dc.contributor.departmentGöteborgs universitet/Institutionen för kulturvårdswe
dc.type.degreeStudent essay


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record