In fact, some LGBTQ people are happy that they criminalized homosexuality again A qualitative study about LGBTQ activism in Mumbai
Abstract
India is one of many countries in the world where homosexual acts are still illegal. India,
however, represents a somewhat unusual development regarding the legal rights of lesbiangay-bisexual-transsexual-queer
(LGBTQ) people. From 1860 to 2009”unnatural intercourse”
(non-penile-virginal sex) was illegal under Section 377 of the Indian panel code. In 2009
Section 377 was read down, but was however reintroduced in 2013. The purpose of the
present study was to investigate how LGBTQ activists perceived the relatively rapid change
in the legal status. Eight semi-structured interviews with LGBTQ activists in Mumbai were
conducted. The interviews covered both their own experiences and their knowledge of the
situation of other LGBTQ individuals in society. In addition, the study aimed at, through the
experiences of these informants, investigating the importance of Section 377 for their
struggle of claiming the rights of LGBTQ people. The main finding was that the status of the
law is central in explaining the social stigma and discrimination that LGBTQ individuals are
subjected to on the basis of their sexual orientation. Furthermore, through the theoretical lens
of queer and intersectional theory, I was able to emphasize that the legal status of LGBTQ
people was not enough in explaining their vulnerable situation. The affiliation of different
sets of social categories, the power exercised by different structures and societal norms was
highly important, according to the activists, in understanding the situation of LGBTQ people.
Therefore, the informants were ambiguous to the consequences, of the legal changes, for the
LGBTQ activism.
Degree
Student essay
View/ Open
Date
2016-05-19Author
Åhlvik, Michaela
Keywords
Section 377, activism, LGBTQ, queer theory, intersectional theory.
Language
eng