Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJagers, Sverker C.
dc.contributor.authorPovitkina, Marina
dc.contributor.authorSjöstedt, Martin
dc.contributor.authorSundström, Aksel
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-08T07:53:25Z
dc.date.available2015-05-08T07:53:25Z
dc.date.issued2013-11
dc.identifier.issn1653-8919
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2077/38903
dc.description.abstractIsland states have been shown to trump continental states on collective action-related outcomes, such as democracy and institutional quality. The argument tested in this article contends that the same logic might apply to environmental goods. However, our empirical analysis shows counter-intuitive results. Firstly, among the 107 cross-national environmental indicators we analyze, being an island only has a positive impact on 20 measurements. Secondly, the causal factors suggested to make islands outperform continen-tal states in other aspects have weak explanatory power when analyzing the variance of the states' envi-ronmental performances. We conclude by discussing how these findings can be further explored.sv
dc.language.isoengsv
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Paperssv
dc.relation.ispartofseries2013:19sv
dc.relation.urihttp://qog.pol.gu.se/digitalAssets/1469/1469248_2013_19_jagers_povitkina_sj--stedt_sundstr--m.pdfsv
dc.subjectenvironmental goodssv
dc.subjectcollective actionsv
dc.subjectenvironmentsv
dc.subjectisland statessv
dc.titleParadise Islands? Island States and the Provision of Environmental Goodssv
dc.typeTextsv
dc.contributor.organizationQoG Institutesv


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record