Why Do Environmental Taxes Work Better in Developed Countries?
Abstract
We compare of the performance of emission taxes between Colombia and Sweden in an experimental setting where subjects are regulated through environmental taxes and had to decide on emission levels, compliance behavior, and adoption of an environmentally friendly technology. Our design allows us to analyze the role of variations in the stringency of the policy enforcement by regulatory agencies in two different cultural contexts. In line with previous literature that emphasizes the role of social norms and intrinsic motivations explaining compliance behavior, we find that actual emissions and tax underreporting are lower than predicted by traditional models that are solely based on self-interested preferences. However, we find that for an equivalent monitoring stringency, there are no statistically significant differences in emission levels and compliance behavior between Colombian and Swedish subjects. This is to say that despite the positive effect of social norms enhancing compliance, a more stringent enforcement remains as an important mechanism to induce firms to comply with the regulation.
Full text file removed. Please contact the authors if you are interested in the paper.
Other description
JEL classification: C91; L51; Q58
Collections
Date
2011-12Author
Coria, Jessica
Villegas-Palacio, Clara
Cárdenas, J.C.
Keywords
laboratory experiments , auctioned tradable emissions permits, imperfect monitoring, technology adoption, developing countries.
emission taxes
imperfect monitoring
technology adoption
developing countries
cross-country comparison
Colombia
Sweden
Publication type
report
ISSN
1403-2465
Series/Report no.
Working Papers in Economics
521
Language
eng